Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ingress class docs #811
Add ingress class docs #811
Changes from all commits
08636f5
1edda65
2b6815a
fa61240
1d983ce
9ef64aa
e3daa36
e81e80a
bdc218f
c9bdfc5
8a7abad
07456c6
86a7140
2c11361
2e2b56b
74fd96b
cfd292b
8eb00b8
fd0f109
2063969
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unnecessary here. The focus of this content isn't to discuss basic Kong proxy concepts, and we may reasonably assume many readers are familiar with them: they're part of the basic set of configuration introduced in our getting started guides.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Three arguments against not including it here:
It costs nothing to add (because the link just changes a term into a hyperlink, and the likelihood of the link rotting is low)
This is a harmful and (imo unnecessary) assumption: some people will come here from a Google search, some people will be only 90% sure about the relationships between routes, services and upstreams.
Wikipedia would cross-link in such situation. Take for example the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact article. The reader may be reasonably assumed to be familiar with terms "Soviet Union" and "Germany", but the article has them linked nonetheless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I allowed myself to make a typographical suggestion because a
:
afterThese flags ...
suggests that a list of flags will follow.For added clarity, made a more direct reference.
nit: the expression "flags ignore an annotation" is incorrect, because in fact these flags make Kong ignore an annotation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dismissed. A colon is a valid option for separating two independent, related clauses. The flags are the focus of the section, and there is only one set of flags within this section. The distinction would be warranted if there were a list of flags both above and below that statement, but that's not the case here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, but other than being valid it's ambiguous if read in isolation. I'm still asking that we apply the suggestion because it disambiguates at a minimal cost.
If you're still not convinced, I won't block you on this because it's on the pedantic side, I agree. I do not understand reasons for not applying this (if it's 1 click away), though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Having no insider context, it would be not absolutely clear to me that custom class means other than the default
kong
. This is not about the lexical definition of the word custom but about defining the boundary between custom and... standard? default?Suggestion: make it clear somehow that custom means other than the default
kong
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confusion noted, but I believe this to be reasonably clear, and personally value succinctness when I do not consider it overly vague. We do not have established terminology here, and I reserve the right to choose a term I feel appropriate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Dismissed. This is covered below, and I find that fully sufficient to achieve my objectives with this example.