Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

try to get SQS queue before creating it #478

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2020

Conversation

fallenhitokiri
Copy link
Contributor

In some environments permissions for an IAM role or access key might not include "SQS create".
The broker should first try to get the queue and if this fails try to create it which matches the current default behaviour.

In some environments permissions for an IAM role or access key might not include "SQS create".
The broker should first try to get the queue and if this fails try to create it as fall back to the current default behaviour.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 22, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #478 into master will decrease coverage by 0.20%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #478      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.18%   90.97%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        3051     3058       +7     
==========================================
  Hits         2782     2782              
- Misses        269      276       +7     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
django_q/brokers/aws_sqs.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7b4c357...9be4da7. Read the comment docs.

@Koed00 Koed00 merged commit 6184a1c into Koed00:master Oct 20, 2020
@Koed00
Copy link
Owner

Koed00 commented Oct 20, 2020

Thanks for the work on the SQS broker!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants