-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 422
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename core notions #710
Comments
|
|
This would allow a lot more readability, that's a good idea. |
I'd love to work on this. |
|
Yes |
So, what else should we name a record as if not object? |
Cannot we be concerned and still use it? |
To elaborate I think that most of the time we will use |
Yes, obj seems to be a good option. Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
What about https://kinto.readthedocs.io/en/stable/api/1.x/records.html |
Nope, because in this case Before it was confusing because there were the terms records and collections in kinto.core... |
Now that
cliquet
is inkinto.core
, some naming is confusing.In the core, resources are called collections, and objects are called records.
But, in Kinto, collections and records are instantiation of resources!
I suggest some renaming in kinto.core:
collection
toresource
record
toobject
collection_id
toresource_name
(orobject_type
?)record_id
toobject_id
That represents quite some work, but reducing confusion is always worth it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: