Drop support for julia 1.0-1.3

[lgoettgens]

Resolves #216, closes #195.

[lgoettgens]

@fingolfin could you please mark the ci jobs for 1.0-1.3 as no longer required?

[hyrodium]

Usually, dropping support for earlier version of Julia is not considered as breaking.

Changing Julia version compatibility must be a non-breaking feature

https://github.com/SciML/ColPrac#dropping-support-for-earlier-versions-of-julia

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #221 (0af536b) into master (7f18f15) will increase coverage by 12.63%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #221       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   76.81%   89.45%   +12.63%     
===========================================
  Files          11       10        -1     
  Lines         772      512      -260     
===========================================
- Hits          593      458      -135     
+ Misses        179       54      -125     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	89.45% <100.00%> (+12.63%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
src/Aqua.jl	73.07% <ø> (ø)
src/utils.jl	90.66% <100.00%> (-0.36%)	⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[lgoettgens]

Usually, dropping support for earlier version of Julia is not considered as breaking.

Changing Julia version compatibility must be a non-breaking feature

https://github.com/SciML/ColPrac#dropping-support-for-earlier-versions-of-julia

This is true for packages with a x.y.z versioning scheme. As Aqua.jl is on version 0.y.z, I can either release this as breaking, or as a patch release. But the julia version should not be restricted on a patch release.

[lgoettgens]

And there will be more breaking changes released together with this in one batch.

[fingolfin]

As requested I marked the ci jobs for 1.0-1.3 as no longer required.

[fingolfin]

Oh, I'll also add the new 1.4 test for Windows and macOS to the list of required tests.

[lgoettgens]

Oh, I'll also add the new 1.4 test for Windows and macOS to the list of required tests.

Can you add "enforce PR labels" as well?

[fingolfin]

@lgoettgens BTW you could have just restarted that one failing job, instead of restarting all :-)

[lgoettgens]

@lgoettgens BTW you could have just restarted that one failing job, instead of restarting all :-)

I know, but I wanted to make sure that this is not something failing on a small percentage of runs, and more runs would maybe find that :)

[lgoettgens]

Windows-1.4 seems to need a bit more time than 10 minutes. I tried to lengthen the timeout for windows jobs.