Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[open62541] v1.3.10, split off v1.4 #8522

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

thomvet
Copy link
Contributor

@thomvet thomvet commented Apr 24, 2024

After building open62541 v1.4 with #7889 rebuilding the wrapper package using Clang.jl proves difficult. Segfaults are encountered when running simple server test cases and figuring out the exact source has been difficult for me so far.

With this PR, I would like to build v.1.3.10 without OpenSSL support and without header amalgamation, while having v.1.4 separately around (unchanged). The hope is that I can first update the generator scripts used in Clang.jl to reflect the lack of amalgamated header file on the patch release 1.3.10 without introducing multiple larger changes (addition of OpenSSL + upgrade to v1.4 (which unfortunately seems to contain some breaking changes - at least as seen from the perspective of my wrapper))

Hopefully I did the splitting of the versions correctly...

O/open62541/open62541@1.3/build_tarballs.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
O/open62541/bundled@1.4/patches/0001-freebsd.patch Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
O/open62541/open62541@1.3/build_tarballs.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
thomvet and others added 4 commits April 24, 2024 11:41
Co-authored-by: Mosè Giordano <giordano@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mosè Giordano <giordano@users.noreply.github.com>
@giordano giordano merged commit a786f23 into JuliaPackaging:master Apr 25, 2024
27 checks passed
@thomvet thomvet deleted the open62541-1.3.10 branch April 25, 2024 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants