-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
effects: complements #43852, implement effect override mechanisms #44561
Conversation
@@ -606,6 +606,9 @@ function abstract_call_method(interp::AbstractInterpreter, method::Method, @nosp | |||
if edge === nothing | |||
edgecycle = edgelimited = true | |||
end | |||
edge_effects = override_edge_effects(edge_effects, method, :consistent) | |||
edge_effects = override_edge_effects(edge_effects, method, sv, :effect_free) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, upon second thought, I think the same argument as to :consistent
, applies to :effect_free
as well, so I think these should all just look at the callee's effects. However, in that case, I'm not completely sure why we need this at all, because the callee's effects should have already caused an override at the conclusion of inference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
However, in that case, I'm not completely sure why we need this at all, because the callee's effects should have already caused an override at the conclusion of inference.
That is because we don't respect annotated effect settings when we update effect property. So even if a callee frame is explicitly annotated as :effect_free
, our effect tracking system may taint its :effect_free
property anyway. This commit basically just overrides that entire result here.
And now I think we should move this effect override mechanism to tristate_merge!
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I thought we were doing this overriding just after inference is done, but before writing the effects into the CodeInstance for caching? I guess that code got lost somewhere? In any case, that's the correct place to put this. The termination override here is just because otherwise you may have to taint something due to recursion, which the termination override prevents.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense. I will (re-)implement the override mechanism just before CodeInstance
caching.
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
The PR #43852 missed to implement the mechanism to override analyzed effects with effect settings annotated by `Base.@assume_effects`. This commits adds such an mechanism within `finish(::InferenceState, ::AbstractInterpreter)`, just after inference analyzed frame effect. Now we can do something like: ```julia Base.@assume_effects :consistent :effect_free :terminates_globally consteval( f, args...; kwargs...) = f(args...; kwargs...) const ___CONST_DICT___ = Dict{Any,Any}(:a => 1, :b => 2) @test fully_eliminated() do consteval(getindex, ___CONST_DICT___, :a) end ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
…4561) The PR #43852 missed to implement the mechanism to override analyzed effects with effect settings annotated by `Base.@assume_effects`. This commits adds such an mechanism within `finish(::InferenceState, ::AbstractInterpreter)`, just after inference analyzed frame effect. Now we can do something like: ```julia Base.@assume_effects :consistent :effect_free :terminates_globally consteval( f, args...; kwargs...) = f(args...; kwargs...) const ___CONST_DICT___ = Dict{Any,Any}(:a => 1, :b => 2) @test fully_eliminated() do consteval(getindex, ___CONST_DICT___, :a) end ```
…al `AbstractInterpreter` with overlayed method table Built on top of #44511 and #44561, and solves <JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#309>. This commit allows external `AbstractInterpreter` to selectively use pure/concrete evals even if it uses an overlayed method table. More specifically, such `AbstractInterpreter` can use pure/concrete evals as far as any callees used in a call in question doesn't come from the overlayed method table: ```julia @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do isbitstype(Int) ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] Base.@assume_effects :terminates_globally function issue41694(x) res = 1 1 < x < 20 || throw("bad") while x > 1 res *= x x -= 1 end return res end @test Base.return_types((), MTOverlayInterp()) do issue41694(3) == 6 ? nothing : missing end == Any[Nothing] ``` In order to check if a call is tainted by any overlayed call, our effect system now additionally tracks `overlayed::Bool` property. This effect property is required to prevents concrete-eval in the following kind of situation: ```julia strangesin(x) = sin(x) @overlay OverlayedMT strangesin(x::Float64) = iszero(x) ? nothing : cos(x) Base.@assume_effects :total totalcall(f, args...) = f(args...) @test Base.return_types(; interp=MTOverlayInterp()) do # we need to disable partial pure/concrete evaluation when tainted by any overlayed call if totalcall(strangesin, 1.0) == cos(1.0) return nothing else return missing end end |> only === Nothing ```
The PR #43852 missed to implement the mechanism to override analyzed
effects with effect settings annotated by
Base.@assume_effects
.This commits adds such an mechanism within
finish(::InferenceState, ::AbstractInterpreter)
,just after inference analyzed frame effect.
Now we can do something like: