Bump openlibm to 0.8.1 #43870
Merged
Bump openlibm to 0.8.1 #43870
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks like this worked. Yay! |
simeonschaub
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2022
From discussion with @Keno on slack, I believe this is the reasons the tests added in #43870 are failing on linux32. (As seen in https://build.julialang.org/#/builders/17/builds/1356/steps/5/logs/stdio for example.) Not sure if `RT_LIBS` is where this should go, so I'd appreciate any feedback.
simeonschaub
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2022
From discussion with @Keno on slack, I believe this is the reasons the tests added in #43870 are failing on linux32. (As seen in https://build.julialang.org/#/builders/17/builds/1356/steps/5/logs/stdio for example.) Not sure if `RT_LIBS` is where this should go, so I'd appreciate any feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Also add the test form #43786 that this is supposed to fix.