Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

optimizer: fix #42246, set ssaflags correctly when inserting coverage statements #42260

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2021

Conversation

aviatesk
Copy link
Member

It seems that this change still doesn't resolve #42258 though.

local back = pwd()
try
@test mktempdir() do dir
cd(dir)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possible to use cd(dir) do... here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

woa, very nice !

aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
…ge statements

It seems that this change still doesn't resolve #42258 though.
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
@aviatesk aviatesk merged commit 1843201 into master Sep 20, 2021
@aviatesk aviatesk deleted the avi/fix42246 branch September 20, 2021 04:57
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
aviatesk added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2021
…ge statements (#42260)

It seems that this change still doesn't resolve #42258 though.
KristofferC pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2021
Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of #42260.
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
…ng coverage statements (JuliaLang#42260)

It seems that this change still doesn't resolve JuliaLang#42258 though.
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
…JuliaLang#42262)

Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of JuliaLang#42260.
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
…ng coverage statements (JuliaLang#42260)

It seems that this change still doesn't resolve JuliaLang#42258 though.
LilithHafner pushed a commit to LilithHafner/julia that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2022
…JuliaLang#42262)

Essentially, this PR adds missing `ssaflags` deletion of `type_annotate!`.
Built on top of JuliaLang#42260.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

optimizer: ssaflags validation after optimization ?
2 participants