We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is this the intended behavior?
This also is one of the causes of #5935 .
julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 0.3.0-prerelease+1757 Commit 8854bad* (2014-02-26 04:04 UTC) Platform Info: System: Linux (i686-redhat-linux) CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2250 @ 1.73GHz WORD_SIZE: 32 BLAS: libopenblas (DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY) LAPACK: libopenblas LIBM: libopenlibm julia> typemax(Int64) * big(3.14) -3.140000000000000124344978758017532527446746826171875e+00 with 256 bits of precision julia> typemax(Int128) * big(3.14) -3.140000000000000124344978758017532527446746826171875e+00 with 256 bits of precision julia> typemax(Int64) * big(1.0) -1e+00 with 256 bits of precision julia> @show typemax(Int128) * big(1.0) typemax(Int128) * big(1.0) => -1e+00 with 256 bits of precision -1e+00 with 256 bits of precision julia>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Nope, that's very broken. The culprit is base/mpfr.jl line 259.
Sorry, something went wrong.
You won't like these either then.
julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 0.3.0-prerelease+1757 Commit 8854bad* (2014-02-26 04:04 UTC) Platform Info: System: Linux (i686-redhat-linux) CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2250 @ 1.73GHz WORD_SIZE: 32 BLAS: libopenblas (DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY) LAPACK: libopenblas LIBM: libopenlibm julia> big(typemax(Uint64)) == typemax(Uint64) * big(1.0) false julia> big(typemax(Uint128)) == typemax(Uint128) * big(1.0) false julia>
fix #5963
df0921b
Revert "fix #5963"
db94ed6
This reverts commit df0921b.
9186e4e
b8e9014
No branches or pull requests
Is this the intended behavior?
This also is one of the causes of #5935 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: