-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bound violation in SparseArrays - segfault #31024
Comments
I think, the type for |
andreasnoack
added
bug
Indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior
sparse
Sparse arrays
labels
Feb 17, 2019
ViralBShah
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2019
* sparse additional checks to avoid narrow Ti * Fixes #31024.
PR got reverted in #31667 |
ViralBShah
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2019
* reconstruct PR #31118 * reconstruct PR 31118 2 * Check arguments of SparseMatrixCSC #31024 #31435 * fix SuiteSparse test * added NEWS, fixed tests * loosen restrictions - resize to useful length * cleaned up NEWS, revert minor change * add non-checking and checking constructor - improve check performance
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As reported here: slack.
The code below produces a segfault.
When starting
julia --check-bounds=yes
the following stack trace is produced:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: