Deprecate Markdown/LaTeX writers as built-ins #833
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In favor of DocumenterMarkdown and DocumenterLaTeX packages.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the user uses
format = :markdown / :latex, they'll be presented with a warning. The warning should be silenced by importing either the DocumenterMarkdown.jl or DocumenterLaTeX.jl package inmake.jl.While the code will not actually be moved to the new packages yet, we should do this now so that we wouldn't not have to go through a breaking release in the future when we actually move the writers out into separate packages.