Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BREAKING] deprecate DataFrame constructors #2464
[BREAKING] deprecate DataFrame constructors #2464
Changes from 9 commits
5123d82
183418e
c5629d4
acff8d0
ee464f8
cda327f
fa36598
0af35eb
67e9b0a
14d3b78
c707173
b52dadb
231f6c0
a352515
b32e82e
33fa8da
63e036e
d5d012f
54f6fdf
4b7b9fe
af68daf
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really understand this comment. Do you mean that here we handle cases where
eltype(x)
doesn't match what other (more standard) constructors accept?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exactly. What we handle is essentially
Any[...]
case (or some weirdUnion{...}[...]
) as it will not be handled by standard constructors.It was not very clear earlier and this is essentially what this code path is for only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I think what confused me is "that are accepted by standard DataFrame constructors", since these are not really accepted, or they wouldn't have to be dealt with in this method. :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you - as usual - propose a better wording (or what we have now is OK?). Thank you!