Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct legend in README plot #366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2020
Merged

Correct legend in README plot #366

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2020

Conversation

baggepinnen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@JuliaControlBot
Copy link

This is an automated message.
Plots were compared to references. 8/11 images have changed, see differences below.
After pulling this PR, please update the reference images by creating a PR to ControlExamplePlots.jl here.

Difference Reference Image New Image
✔️ 0.005 Reference New
✔️ 0.002 Reference New
✔️ 0.004 Reference New
✔️ 0.001 Reference New
✔️ 0.006 Reference New
✔️ 0.004 Reference New
✔️ 0.006 Reference New
✔️ 0.004 Reference New

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #366 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #366   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.42%   82.42%           
=======================================
  Files          31       31           
  Lines        2822     2822           
=======================================
  Hits         2326     2326           
  Misses        496      496           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d6de5bb...772bccd. Read the comment docs.

@baggepinnen baggepinnen merged commit 96dd72d into master Oct 11, 2020
@baggepinnen baggepinnen deleted the readmelabel branch October 11, 2020 12:46
@mfalt
Copy link
Member

mfalt commented Oct 11, 2020

We should probably just remove the TransferFunction[...] notation also. It was needed in some early version of the package to avoid creating a mimo system

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants