Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore(devtools): make code coverage check informational for now #1713

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2023
Merged

chore(devtools): make code coverage check informational for now #1713

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2023

Conversation

sbruens
Copy link
Contributor

@sbruens sbruens commented Sep 18, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@sbruens sbruens requested a review from a team September 18, 2023 17:31
@sbruens sbruens marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2023 17:31
@sbruens sbruens changed the base branch from master to sbruens/test-dev September 20, 2023 03:23
daniellacosse
daniellacosse approved these changes Sep 20, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@daniellacosse daniellacosse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for figuring this out!!

@sbruens sbruens changed the base branch from sbruens/test-dev to master September 20, 2023 20:03
@sbruens sbruens merged commit a89eb6c into master Sep 20, 2023
17 checks passed
@sbruens sbruens deleted the sbruens/codecov branch September 20, 2023 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@daniellacosse daniellacosse daniellacosse approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
size/XS
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@sbruens @daniellacosse