Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ContractModel: lazier precondition for ContractModel #363

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 22, 2022

Conversation

MaximilianAlgehed
Copy link
Contributor

This fixes a tiny bug whereby the precondition for ContractModel actions was slightly stricter than it needs to be - which caused some clever tricks(tm) to break.

Pre-submit checklist:

  • Branch
    • Tests are provided (if possible)
    • Commit sequence broadly makes sense
    • Key commits have useful messages
    • Relevant tickets are mentioned in commit messages
    • Formatting, materialized Nix files, PNG optimization, etc. are updated
  • PR
    • Self-reviewed the diff
    • Useful pull request description
    • Reviewer requested

@MaximilianAlgehed
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sjoerdvisscher ping :)

@sjoerdvisscher
Copy link
Contributor

This really needs a comment otherwise it will be broken again with the next change. :)

@MaximilianAlgehed
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sjoerdvisscher did Hydra break?

@koslambrou koslambrou merged commit 0642887 into IntersectMBO:main Mar 22, 2022
@MaximilianAlgehed MaximilianAlgehed deleted the PR-contractmodel-bugfixes branch January 4, 2023 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants