Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cardano-testnet: remove possibility to programmatically pass a custom node configuration file (it was unused) #6118

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025
Merged

cardano-testnet: remove possibility to programmatically pass a custom node configuration file (it was unused) #6118

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2025

Conversation

smelc
Copy link
Contributor

@smelc smelc commented Feb 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • CI passes. See note on CI. The following CI checks are required:
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@smelc smelc force-pushed the smelc/remove-unused-cardano-testnet-feature branch from 9d08520 to fa2c78d Compare February 18, 2025 13:48
@smelc smelc marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2025 14:03
@smelc smelc requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2025 14:03
@smelc smelc force-pushed the smelc/remove-unused-cardano-testnet-feature branch from fa2c78d to d510758 Compare February 19, 2025 10:34
@smelc smelc added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 757f338 Feb 20, 2025
24 checks passed
@smelc smelc deleted the smelc/remove-unused-cardano-testnet-feature branch February 20, 2025 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@carbolymer carbolymer carbolymer approved these changes

@Jimbo4350 Jimbo4350 Jimbo4350 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@smelc @carbolymer @Jimbo4350