Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SU2 benchmarking #1017

Open
wants to merge 42 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

SU2 benchmarking #1017

wants to merge 42 commits into from

Conversation

cdbf1
Copy link
Contributor

@cdbf1 cdbf1 commented Aug 8, 2024

Add SU2 benchmarking to the QCVV library

Closes: #1006

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@cdbf1 cdbf1 marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 09:03
Copy link
Contributor

@dowusu-antwi dowusu-antwi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some nits:

supermarq-benchmarks/supermarq/qcvv/su2.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
supermarq-benchmarks/supermarq/qcvv/su2.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
supermarq-benchmarks/supermarq/qcvv/su2.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
supermarq-benchmarks/examples/qcvv/qcvv.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
supermarq-benchmarks/supermarq/qcvv/su2.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 231 to 232
self._haar_random_rotation().on(self.qubits[0]),
self._haar_random_rotation().on(self.qubits[1]),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i believe the same rotation is supposed to be applied to both gates, so that they can be done with a single global pulse on systems that support it (the language in the paper is "random global single-qubit rotations between sequences of CZ entangling gates")

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry only just seen this comment.
Yes I agree, thanks. I must have misinterpreted the paper. Now fixed 😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support SU(2) benchmarking
3 participants