Call uthash HASH_VALUE() instead of HASH_FUNCTION()
#85
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HASH_FUNCTION() is an extension point, not part of the public API. Use HASH_VALUE() instead. The former happens to work with uthash >= 2.3.0, but not with older versions. Fixes build with uthash-static from RHEL 8.
|
Oh drat, I updated changelog in my fork of libdicom, not the main one. Sorry about that. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HASH_FUNCTION()is an extension point, not part of the public API. UseHASH_VALUE()instead. The former happens to work with uthash ≥ 2.3.0, but not with older versions.Fixes build with
uthash-staticfrom RHEL 8.Also update changelog for 1.1.0 release.