Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SacessOptimizer, ESSOptimizer: Bound-normalize parameters for proximity check #1462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

dweindl
Copy link
Member

@dweindl dweindl commented Sep 16, 2024

Previously, the distance was scaled to the second point, which didn't make too much sense. Now it's scaled to the parameter bounds.

…ty check

Previously, the distance was scaled to the second point, which didn't make too much sense.
Now it's scaled to the parameter bounds.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 16, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.43%. Comparing base (5c58374) to head (e518b5c).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1462      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    83.40%   83.43%   +0.02%     
===========================================
  Files          160      160              
  Lines        13499    13502       +3     
===========================================
+ Hits         11259    11265       +6     
+ Misses        2240     2237       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dweindl dweindl marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2024 13:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulJonasJost PaulJonasJost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems to make sense to me 👍🏼

Copy link
Contributor

@stephanmg stephanmg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@dweindl dweindl merged commit b88356f into ICB-DCM:develop Sep 16, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@dweindl dweindl deleted the sacess_proximity_check branch September 16, 2024 14:27
This was referenced Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants