fix(ibm-well-defined-dictionaries): include patternProperties in vali…

…dation (#713)

Currently, the rule only considers dictionaries defined with
`additionalProperties`. OpenAPI 3.1.x supports defining dictionaries
with `patternProperties`, so this commit adds consideration for this
field in its validation, in addition to `additionalProperties`.

Signed-off-by: Dustin Popp <dpopp07@gmail.com>

.secrets.baseline

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
     "files": "package-lock.json|^.secrets.baseline$",
     "lines": null
   },
-  "generated_at": "2024-12-19T16:14:03Z",
+  "generated_at": "2025-01-09T19:49:59Z",
   "plugins_used": [
     {
       "name": "AWSKeyDetector"

docs/ibm-cloud-rules.md

@@ -7328,8 +7328,8 @@ paths:
   This rule validates that any dictionary schemas are well defined and that all values share a single type.
   Dictionaries are defined as object type schemas that have variable key names. They are distinct from model types,
   which are objects with pre-defined properties. A schema must not define both concrete properties and variable key names.
-  Practically, this means a schema must explicitly define a `properties` object or an `additionalProperties` schema, but not both.
-  If used, the `additionalProperties` schema must define a concrete type. The concrete type of the values must not be a dictionary itself. See the <a href="https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/api-handbook?topic=api-handbook-types">IBM Cloud API Handbook documentation on types</a> for more info.
+  Practically, this means a schema must explicitly define a `properties` object or an `(additional|pattern)Properties` schema, but not both.
+  If used, the `(additional|pattern)Properties` schema must define a concrete type. The concrete type of the values must not be a dictionary itself. See the <a href="https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/api-handbook?topic=api-handbook-types">IBM Cloud API Handbook documentation on types</a> for more info.
 </td>
 </tr>
 <tr>

packages/ruleset/src/functions/well-defined-dictionaries.js

@@ -1,20 +1,26 @@
 /**
- * Copyright 2024 IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2024 - 2025 IBM Corporation.
  * SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache2.0
  */
 
 const {
   isObject,
   isObjectSchema,
   schemaHasConstraint,
-  schemaLooselyHasConstraint,
   validateNestedSchemas,
 } = require('@ibm-cloud/openapi-ruleset-utilities');
 const { LoggerFactory } = require('../utils');
 
 let ruleId;
 let logger;
 
+/**
+ * The implementation for this rule makes assumptions that are dependent on the
+ * presence of the following other rules:
+ *
+ * - ibm-pattern-properties: patternProperties isn't empty or the wrong type
+ */
+
 module.exports = function (schema, _opts, context) {
   if (!logger) {
     ruleId = context.rule.name;
@@ -32,23 +38,23 @@ function wellDefinedDictionaries(schema, path) {
 
   // We will flag dictionaries of dictionaries, so we can skip
   // providing guidance for directly nested dictionaries.
-  if (path.at(-1) === 'additionalProperties') {
+  if (isDictionaryValueSchema(path)) {
     return [];
   }
 
   logger.debug(
     `${ruleId}: checking object schema at location: ${path.join('.')}`
   );
 
-  // Dictionaries should have additionalProperties defined on them.
-  // If the schema doesn't, make sure it has properties and then
-  // abandon the check.
-  if (!schemaDefinesField(schema, 'additionalProperties')) {
+  // Dictionaries should have additionalProperties or patternProperties
+  // defined on them. If the schema doesn't, make sure it has properties
+  // and then abandon the check.
+  if (!isDictionarySchema(schema)) {
     if (!schemaDefinesField(schema, 'properties')) {
       return [
         {
           message:
-            'Object schemas must define either properties, or additionalProperties with a concrete type',
+            'Object schemas must define either properties, or (additional/pattern)Properties with a concrete type',
           path,
         },
       ];
@@ -79,8 +85,7 @@ function wellDefinedDictionaries(schema, path) {
   // more strict in the future but this meets our current purposes.
   if (schemaHasConstraint(schema, isAmbiguousDictionary)) {
     errors.push({
-      message:
-        'Dictionary schemas must have a single, well-defined value type in `additionalProperties`',
+      message: 'Dictionary schemas must have a single, well-defined value type',
       path,
     });
   }
@@ -89,7 +94,7 @@ function wellDefinedDictionaries(schema, path) {
   // should not be dictionaries themselves.
   if (schemaHasConstraint(schema, isDictionaryOfDictionaries)) {
     errors.push({
-      message: 'Dictionaries must not have values that are also dictionaries.',
+      message: 'Dictionaries must not have values that are also dictionaries',
       path,
     });
   }
@@ -102,29 +107,46 @@ function schemaDefinesField(schema, field) {
 }
 
 function isAmbiguousDictionary(schema) {
-  if (!schema.additionalProperties) {
-    return false;
-  }
-
-  // additionalProperties must be an object (not a boolean) value
-  // and must define a `type` field in order to be considered an
-  // unambiguous dictionary.
-  return (
-    !isObject(schema.additionalProperties) ||
-    !schemaDefinesField(schema.additionalProperties, 'type')
+  return dictionaryValuesHaveConstraint(
+    schema,
+    valueSchema =>
+      !isObject(valueSchema) || !schemaDefinesField(valueSchema, 'type')
   );
 }
 
 function isDictionaryOfDictionaries(schema) {
-  if (!isObject(schema.additionalProperties)) {
+  return dictionaryValuesHaveConstraint(
+    schema,
+    valueSchema => isObject(valueSchema) && isDictionarySchema(valueSchema)
+  );
+}
+
+function dictionaryValuesHaveConstraint(schema, hasConstraint) {
+  return schemaHasConstraint(schema, s => {
+    if (s.additionalProperties !== undefined) {
+      return hasConstraint(s.additionalProperties);
+    }
+
+    if (s.patternProperties !== undefined) {
+      return Object.values(s.patternProperties).some(p => hasConstraint(p));
+    }
+
     return false;
-  }
+  });
+}
 
-  // We don't want any schema that may define the dictionary values
-  // to also be a dictionary, so we use a looser constraint that
-  // checks against any oneOf/anyOf schema.
-  return schemaLooselyHasConstraint(
-    schema.additionalProperties,
-    s => !!s['additionalProperties']
+// Check, *by path*, if the current schema is a dictionary value schema.
+function isDictionaryValueSchema(path) {
+  return (
+    path.at(-1) === 'additionalProperties' ||
+    path.at(-2) === 'patternProperties'
+  );
+}
+
+// Check, *by object fields* if the current schema is a dictionary or not.
+function isDictionarySchema(schema) {
+  return (
+    schemaDefinesField(schema, 'additionalProperties') ||
+    schemaDefinesField(schema, 'patternProperties')
   );
 }