refactor: OPTIC-931: Remove Stale Feature Flag - ff_back_1614_rejecte…

[luarmr]

PR fulfills these requirements

• Commit message(s) and PR title follows the format [fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made ex. fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
• Tests for the changes have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
• Docs have been added/updated (for bug fixes/features)
• Best efforts were made to ensure docs/code are concise and coherent (checked for spelling/grammatical errors, commented out code, debug logs etc.)
• Self-reviewed and ran all changes on a local instance (for bug fixes/features)

Change has impacts in these area(s)

(check all that apply)

• Product design
• Backend (Database)
• Backend (API)
• Frontend

Describe the reason for change

Removing an stale ff_flag that is already stale for more than a month.

What does this fix?

Clean code

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for heartex-docs canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	4e9d3cf
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/heartex-docs/deploys/66a2ded2da6abe000845beda

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for label-studio-docs-new-theme canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	4e9d3cf
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/label-studio-docs-new-theme/deploys/66a2ded267e39c0008cbf832

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.77%. Comparing base (1a69603) to head (4e9d3cf).
Report is 18 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6136      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.73%   76.77%   +0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          168      168              
  Lines        13628    13650      +22     
===========================================
+ Hits         10458    10480      +22     
  Misses        3170     3170              

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytests	76.77% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[yyassi-heartex]

removing it is great but im confused why it was defined in LSO if it wasnt used here? or was the FF declaration just missed when originally removing the code that used it?

[luarmr]

@yyassi-heartexI had the same question. I believe it was created here as well, just in case it will be used and it never did.