Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure chained experiment definitions are copies of base #485

Conversation

douglasjacobsen
Copy link
Collaborator

This merge fixes an issue where chained experiment definitions were all references to the base experiment definition. As a result, when an experiment generated the commands for its chained experiments the commands were never allowed to render again. This caused repeat experiments (which clone a base experiment) to have the incorrect execution command (which only referred to the base experiment).

This commit fixes an issue where chained experiment definitions were all
references to the base experiment definition. As a result, when an
experiment generated the commands for its chained experiments the
commands were never allowed to render again. This caused repeat
experiments (which clone a base experiment) to have the incorrect
execution command (which only referred to the base experiment).
@douglasjacobsen douglasjacobsen added the bug Something isn't working label May 13, 2024
@douglasjacobsen douglasjacobsen requested a review from dapomeroy May 13, 2024 14:51
Copy link
Collaborator

@dapomeroy dapomeroy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dapomeroy dapomeroy merged commit c18aa18 into GoogleCloudPlatform:develop May 13, 2024
5 checks passed
@douglasjacobsen douglasjacobsen deleted the fix_chained_repeat_index_in_command branch May 16, 2024 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants