-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add FIPS enablement option to Looker #11488
Conversation
Hello! I am a robot. Tests will require approval from a repository maintainer to run. @ScottSuarez, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_looker_instance" "primary" {
fips_enabled = # value needed
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 5 Click here to see the affected service packages
View the build log |
Is this field GA? I don't see it documented at https://cloud.google.com/looker/docs/reference/rest/v1/projects.locations.instances |
@ScottSuarez Hi, no it is not officially GA yet, it is behind a visibility label. However it is planned to be GA at the end of the month, with expectations to use the field immediately in Terraform once it GAs. |
Do you have a specific date? I want to make sure this field doesn't confuse customers as it won't be available at the time the release notes are published. In general I believe it might be okay in this instance as the delta between the next release and your feature release is potentially small. |
So I do not have a specific date, but GA is immediately after our rollout which ends Sept 2/3 |
From my team lead on merging changes before GA. Otherwise we'd recommend EAP or beta depending on the situation, promoting to GA later. Beta if non-allowlisted and EAP otherwise. |
@ScottSuarez This PR has been waiting for review for 3 weekdays. Please take a look! Use the label |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Waiting for GA
@efeelaiho, this PR is waiting for action from you. Please address any comments or change requests, or re-request review from a core reviewer if no action is required. If no action is taken, this PR will be closed in 28 days. This notification can be disabled with the |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
Missing test reportYour PR includes resource fields which are not covered by any test. Resource: resource "google_looker_instance" "primary" {
fips_enabled = # value needed
}
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 6 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Co-authored-by: Scott Suarez <ScottSuarez@google.com>
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 6 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Co-authored-by: Scott Suarez <ScottSuarez@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Suarez <ScottSuarez@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Scott Suarez <ScottSuarez@google.com>
Add FIPS enablement option to Looker
Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)