Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for the wrong updateBuildNumber behavior #2457

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 17, 2020
Merged

Conversation

kirkone
Copy link
Contributor

@kirkone kirkone commented Nov 17, 2020

When updateBuildNumber is set to false the Build Number is still be overwritten.

Description

As discussed in #1770 the switch should result in a different behavior.

Related Issue

#1457
#1770

Motivation and Context

The behavior was not implemented in the way it was intended. This should fix this.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested on my local machine and in my own Azure DevOps instance.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

When `updateBuildNumber` is set to false the Build Number is still be overwritten.
@kirkone
Copy link
Contributor Author

kirkone commented Nov 17, 2020

@arturcic I am not sure about the tests. Is it ok to have them that way?

@kirkone kirkone marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2020 10:11
@arturcic arturcic merged commit 794fec1 into GitTools:master Nov 17, 2020
@kirkone kirkone deleted the patch-1 branch November 17, 2020 10:13
@arturcic arturcic added this to the 5.5.2 milestone Nov 17, 2020
@arturcic
Copy link
Member

@kirkone thank you so much for your contributions 👍

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 5.6.0 🎉
The release is available on:

Your GitReleaseManager bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants