Fix alignments read filter jexl syntax

[cmdcolin]

This fixes the filters on alignments track e.g. read name, which currently had jexl syntax errors which are displayed in 1.1.0 if filters attempt to be used

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1860 (9c70dc6) into main (1ed6ae8) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1860      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.18%   59.17%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         460      460              
  Lines       21402    21402              
  Branches     5024     5024              
==========================================
- Hits        12667    12665       -2     
- Misses       8428     8430       +2     
  Partials      307      307              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...lugins/alignments/src/LinearPileupDisplay/model.ts	69.02% <ø> (ø)
...ments/src/LinearSNPCoverageDisplay/models/model.ts	69.23% <ø> (ø)
...inearGenomeView/components/RefNameAutocomplete.tsx	89.36% <0.00%> (-4.26%)	⬇️
packages/core/util/index.ts	80.99% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1ed6ae8...9c70dc6. Read the comment docs.

[rbuels]

Is there anything we can do in the code to make these jexl syntax errors get detected sooner? cc @peterkxie

Could maybe make a jexl() util function that just returns the passed string, but also syntax checks it if inDevelopment?

[cmdcolin]

probably just need more unit/integration testing, not sure there is a nice way to "automatically detect a syntax error" here

[peterkxie]

I think more unit/integration testing is the best solution, with us changing jexl from functions -> transforms -> functions that is probably the source of most syntax errors. After catching the initial batch it should be easier now that we are sticking with functions