-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix GetEnumerator #244
Fix GetEnumerator #244
Conversation
Given the ABI change in this PR, and given that 5.0.0-beta3 has now been out and stable for a while, I would like to release 5.0.0 first, and then release 6.0.0-beta1 immediately after with the upgrade to Arrow 6.0.0 and this PR. @philjdf @adamreeve @adeboyed what are your thoughts on that? |
Could this PR be included in the 5.0.0 release? Upgrading to Arrow 6 may potentially lead to extended testing to ensure that the new features are supported and any API changes are made. |
If you are talking about ParquetSharp itself, then there are no API changes stemming from the upgrade to Arrow 6, and no new features. All the work has already been done in #230 and is just waiting for 5.0.0 stable to be released.
If you mean 5.0.0 stable, then I would be quite reluctant in having an ABI change included without releasing another beta first. We could however include it in another 5.0.0 beta. This would push the work on the 6.0.0 series further however, which I'm not really keen on, especially as #68 and #229 would be fixed by it. |
@adeboyed could you please let me know today if my comment above makes sense to you — if yes, I'll go ahead and release 5.0.0 and 6.0.0-beta1 (@philjdf and @adamreeve already agreed offline with this approach) |
Hi Jonathan, this approach makes sense to me. Line 145 in 8ce5932
|
The upgrade to Arrow 6.0.1 has also been merged (PR #247). |
ParquetSharp 6.0.1-beta1 has been released with this fix. |
Would close #242