Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I 2 #38

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

I 2 #38

wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

MatteoDelOmbra
Copy link

@MatteoDelOmbra MatteoDelOmbra commented Jan 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new HTTP file upload task for executing file uploads with various authentication methods.
    • Supports POST and PUT HTTP methods.
    • Configurable request options including authentication, timeouts, and certificate handling.
    • Introduced new enumerations and classes for authentication, headers, input, and response handling.
  • Documentation

    • Added comprehensive README with installation and usage instructions.
    • Created changelog for initial version 1.0.0.
  • Infrastructure

    • Introduced GitHub Actions workflows for build, test, and release processes.
    • Added Visual Studio solution and project files for the task.
  • Testing

    • Implemented integration tests for file upload functionality.
    • Added test files and test project configuration.
    • Created a certificate handler for managing self-signed certificates in tests.

@MatteoDelOmbra MatteoDelOmbra linked an issue Jan 10, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Walkthrough

A new Frends task for HTTP file uploads has been introduced, providing a comprehensive solution for uploading files via HTTP requests. The implementation includes a robust set of configurations for authentication, headers, and request options. The project is structured with separate components for definitions, task implementation, and testing, supporting .NET 6.0. GitHub Actions workflows have been added to manage continuous integration and deployment, including build, test, and release processes.

Changes

File/Directory Change Summary
.github/workflows/ Added three new workflow files: UploadFile build_main, UploadFile push, and UploadFile release for managing build, test, and release processes.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/CHANGELOG.md Initial changelog created for version 1.0.0.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/ Added multiple definition classes: Authentication, Header, Input, Method, Options, Response.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.cs Implemented main UploadFileTask with UploadFile method for HTTP file uploads.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/HttpClientHandlerExtensions.cs Added extension methods for configuring HTTP client handler.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/README.md Created project-specific README with installation and usage instructions.
README.md Updated with new UploadFile task reference.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests.csproj New project file created for testing with necessary package references.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs New integration test class added to verify HTTP file upload functionality.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Test_files/test_file.txt Added test content to the file.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.sln New solution file created including references to main and test projects.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Options.cs New class added to encapsulate HTTP request options.
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/CertificateHandler.cs New static class for managing self-signed certificates in tests.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant UploadFileTask
    participant HttpClient
    participant Server

    User->>UploadFileTask: Prepare Input and Options
    UploadFileTask->>HttpClient: Configure Request
    HttpClient->>Server: Send File Upload Request
    Server-->>HttpClient: Return Response
    HttpClient-->>UploadFileTask: Process Response
    UploadFileTask->>User: Return Response Details
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Upload Delight

With headers set and bytes so bright,
Our HTTP task takes flight so neat,
Uploading files with rabbit's might,
Making connections smooth and sleek,
A digital dance of pure delight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 17

🧹 Nitpick comments (23)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Method.cs (2)

1-17: LGTM! Consider future extensibility.

The enum implementation is clean and well-documented. The choice of POST and PUT methods is appropriate for file upload operations.

Consider these enhancements for future extensibility:

  1. Add a default value to make the enum more robust:
 public enum Method
 {
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Default method for file uploads.
+    /// </summary>
+    POST = 0,
     /// <summary>
-    /// The HTTP POST method is used to submit an entity to the specified resource, often causing a change in state or side effects on the server.
-    /// </summary>
-    POST,
-    /// <summary>
     /// The HTTP PUT method is used to replace or update a current resource with new content.
     /// </summary>
-    PUT
+    PUT = 1
 }

4-7: Enhance enum documentation with usage guidance.

The current documentation clearly describes the purpose. Consider enhancing it with guidance on when to use each method for file uploads.

 /// <summary>
-/// Represents the HTTP method to be used with the request.
+/// Represents the HTTP method to be used with the file upload request.
+/// Use POST for uploading new files and PUT when replacing existing files at a specific URL.
 /// </summary>
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Options.cs (6)

21-23: Add input validation for username.

Consider adding validation attributes to ensure the username is not empty and follows the correct format for Windows Authentication (domain\username).

 [UIHint(nameof(Definitions.Authentication), "", Authentication.WindowsAuthentication, Authentication.Basic)]
+[Required(ErrorMessage = "Username is required")]
+[RegularExpression(@"^([^\\]*\\)?[^\\]+$", ErrorMessage = "For Windows Authentication, use domain\\username format")]
 public string Username { get; set; }

44-45: Add certificate thumbprint validation.

Consider adding validation to ensure the certificate thumbprint follows the correct format.

 [UIHint(nameof(Definitions.Authentication), "", Authentication.ClientCertificate)]
+[RegularExpression(@"^[a-fA-F0-9]{40}$", ErrorMessage = "Invalid certificate thumbprint format")]
 public string CertificateThumbprint { get; set; }

51-52: Add range validation for timeout.

Add validation to ensure the timeout value is within a reasonable range.

 [DefaultValue(30)]
+[Range(1, 3600, ErrorMessage = "Timeout must be between 1 and 3600 seconds")]
 public int ConnectionTimeoutSeconds { get; set; }

74-77: Fix typo in XML documentation.

The word "successful" is misspelled in the documentation.

 /// <summary>
-/// Throw exception if return code of request is not successfull
+/// Throw exception if return code of request is not successful
 /// </summary>
 /// <example>true</example> 

65-71: Add default values for boolean properties.

Consider adding default values for AllowInvalidCertificate and AllowInvalidResponseContentTypeCharSet to make the behavior more predictable.

+[DefaultValue(false)]
 public bool AllowInvalidCertificate { get; set; }

 /// <summary>
 /// Some API's return faulty content-type charset header. This setting overrides the returned charset.
 /// </summary>
 /// <example>false</example>
+[DefaultValue(false)]
 public bool AllowInvalidResponseContentTypeCharSet { get; set; }

61-65: Add security warning in documentation.

The AllowInvalidCertificate option can pose security risks. Consider adding a warning in the documentation.

 /// <summary>
 /// Do not throw an exception on certificate error.
+/// WARNING: Enabling this option may expose your application to man-in-the-middle attacks.
+/// Use only in development or in controlled environments where self-signed certificates are necessary.
 /// </summary>
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Response.cs (3)

8-9: Consider making the Response class immutable

To ensure thread safety and prevent unintended modifications after the response is created, consider making the properties read-only by removing their setters and initializing them through the constructor.

 public class Response
 {
+    public Response(string body, Dictionary<string, string> headers, int statusCode)
+    {
+        Body = body;
+        Headers = new Dictionary<string, string>(headers);
+        StatusCode = statusCode;
+    }

10-21: Consider adding content type handling

The Body property as a string might not be optimal for all response types (e.g., binary data, different encodings). Consider adding content type handling and appropriate type conversion.

+    /// <summary>
+    /// The content type of the response body.
+    /// </summary>
+    public string ContentType { get; set; }

     /// <summary>
     /// The body of the response.
+    /// Note: For binary data, consider using byte[] instead of string.
     /// </summary>
-    public string Body { get; set; }
+    public object Body { get; set; }

37-41: Use HttpStatusCode enum for type safety

Replace the int type with System.Net.HttpStatusCode enum to ensure only valid HTTP status codes are used.

+using System.Net;

     /// <summary>
     /// The status code of the response, as an integer value.
     /// </summary>
     /// <example>200</example>
-    public int StatusCode { get; set; }
+    public HttpStatusCode StatusCode { get; set; }
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Authentication.cs (3)

1-6: Consider adding security-related documentation.

While the basic documentation is good, consider adding security recommendations and best practices for each authentication method in the enum's main documentation. This would help developers make informed decisions about which authentication method to use.

Add additional XML documentation like this:

 /// <summary>
 /// Represents the authentication method to be used with the request.
 /// </summary>
+/// <remarks>
+/// When choosing an authentication method, consider:
+/// - Basic authentication should only be used over HTTPS
+/// - WindowsAuthentication is recommended for intranet scenarios
+/// - OAuth is recommended for public API access
+/// - ClientCertificate provides strong security but requires certificate management
+/// </remarks>
 public enum Authentication

28-31: Enhance OAuth documentation with token requirements.

The OAuth documentation should specify what type of token is expected (Bearer, JWT, etc.) and any requirements for token management.

Enhance the documentation like this:

 /// <summary>
 /// OAuth token-based authentication is used, where a token is obtained from an authentication server and used to authenticate the request.
+/// The token should be a valid Bearer token. JWT tokens are recommended.
+/// Ensure proper token lifecycle management including refresh and expiration handling.
 /// </summary>

33-36: Add certificate requirements to ClientCertificate documentation.

The ClientCertificate documentation should specify the certificate requirements and format expectations.

Enhance the documentation like this:

 /// <summary>
 /// Client certificate-based authentication is used, where a client certificate is used to authenticate the request.
+/// Requires a valid X.509 certificate. The certificate must be installed in the certificate store
+/// or provided as a .pfx/.p12 file with the private key.
 /// </summary>
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs (2)

13-22: Consider improving test isolation and cleanup.

Two suggestions for better test reliability:

  1. Consider using a random available port instead of hard-coding port 9191 to avoid potential conflicts in CI environments.
  2. Add a [TearDown] method to properly dispose of the HTTP server.
 private IHttpServer _stubHttp;
+private int _port;

 [SetUp]
 public void Setup()
 {
-    _stubHttp = HttpMockRepository.At("http://localhost:9191");
+    _port = GetAvailablePort(); // Helper method to find free port
+    _stubHttp = HttpMockRepository.At($"http://localhost:{_port}");
 }

+[TearDown]
+public void Cleanup()
+{
+    _stubHttp?.Dispose();
+}

32-49: Enhance test robustness and coverage.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add explicit verification of response status code
  2. Add timeout handling for assertions
  3. Test with various encoding scenarios
 var result = await UploadFileTask.UploadFile(input, options, CancellationToken.None);
+Assert.That(result.StatusCode, Is.EqualTo(200));
+
 var request = _stubHttp.AssertWasCalled(called => called.Post("/endpoint")).LastRequest();
+Assert.That(request, Is.Not.Null, "Request was not received within timeout");
+
 var requestHead = request.RequestHead;
 var requestBodyByteArray = Encoding.GetEncoding(codePageName).GetBytes(request.Body);
 var requestContentType = requestHead.Headers["cONTENT-tYpE"];

-//Casing should not affect setting header.
+// Verify header case-insensitivity and content
 Assert.That(requestContentType, Is.EqualTo(expectedContentType));
 Assert.That(requestBodyByteArray, Is.EqualTo(utf8ByteArray));
+
+// Verify response encoding
+Assert.That(result.Content, Does.Contain("���"), "Response should preserve special characters");
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Header.cs (1)

11-17: Properties should be initialized to avoid null values

The Name and Value properties may be null if not set, which can cause NullReferenceException when used. Consider initializing them with empty strings or adding null checks where they are used.

Apply this diff to initialize properties:

     public class Header
     {
-        public string Name { get; set; }
+        public string Name { get; set; } = string.Empty;

-        public string Value { get; set; }
+        public string Value { get; set; } = string.Empty;
     }
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/HttpClientHandlerExtensions.cs (2)

24-28: Improve parsing of domain and username

Splitting the username on '\' might fail if the username contains a backslash or if the domain is missing. Consider using a more robust method to parse domain and username and handle cases where the domain is not provided.

Apply this diff to improve parsing:

     case Authentication.WindowsAuthentication:
-        var domainAndUserName = options.Username.Split('\\');
-        if (domainAndUserName.Length != 2)
+        var separatorIndex = options.Username.IndexOf('\\');
+        if (separatorIndex <= 0)
         {
             throw new ArgumentException($@"Username needs to be in the format 'domain\username', but it was '{options.Username}'");
         }
-        handler.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(domainAndUserName[1], options.Password, domainAndUserName[0]);
+        var domain = options.Username.Substring(0, separatorIndex);
+        var username = options.Username.Substring(separatorIndex + 1);
+        handler.Credentials = new NetworkCredential(username, options.Password, domain);
         break;

54-54: Throw a more appropriate exception when the certificate is not found

Throwing a FileNotFoundException may not accurately represent the issue. Consider throwing a CryptographicException or a custom exception to indicate that the certificate was not found.

Apply this diff to throw a more specific exception:

-        throw new FileNotFoundException($"Certificate with thumbprint: '{thumbprint}' not found in current user cert store.");
+        throw new CryptographicException($"Certificate with thumbprint '{thumbprint}' not found in the current user's certificate store.");
.github/workflows/UploadFile_build_and_test_on_main.yml (1)

7-8: Consider adding package.json to path filters.

The path filter correctly watches the main directory. Consider also watching package-related files that might affect the build.

    paths:
      - "Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/**"
+     - "Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/package.json"
+     - "Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/package-lock.json"
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/README.md (2)

11-15: Improve installation instructions and URL formatting.

The installation section needs the following improvements:

  1. Format the MyGet URL as a proper Markdown link
  2. Add version compatibility information
  3. Include step-by-step UI installation instructions

Apply this diff to fix the bare URL:

-https://www.myget.org/F/frends-tasks/api/v2.
+[https://www.myget.org/F/frends-tasks/api/v2](https://www.myget.org/F/frends-tasks/api/v2)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

14-14: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


16-28: Enhance building instructions with prerequisites and context.

The building section should include:

  • Required tools and versions (.NET 6.0, etc.)
  • Development environment setup steps
  • Explanation of what each command does
  • Location where the NuGet package will be generated
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Input.cs (1)

4-36: Security Advisory: Implement comprehensive security measures.

This class handles sensitive operations (file uploads and HTTP requests) and requires thorough security implementation:

  1. URL Security:

    • Implement allowlist/blocklist for domains
    • Validate URL schemes (e.g., prevent file:// URLs)
    • Consider using Uri class for parsing
  2. File Security:

    • Implement file type validation
    • Set maximum file size limits
    • Use secure file handling practices
  3. Header Security:

    • Prevent header injection
    • Validate header names and values
    • Consider using a predefined set of allowed headers

Consider creating a separate security configuration class to centralize and manage these security measures.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bab0a5 and 374f7fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (20)
  • .github/workflows/UploadFile_build_and_test_on_main.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/UploadFile_build_and_test_on_push.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/UploadFile_release.yml (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Test_files/test_file.txt (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.sln (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Authentication.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Header.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Input.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Method.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Options.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Response.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.csproj (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/FrendsTaskMetadata.json (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/HttpClientHandlerExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/README.md (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/CHANGELOG.md
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Test_files/test_file.txt
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/FrendsTaskMetadata.json
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.sln
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Response.cs

31-31: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/README.md

14-14: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Options.cs (1)

1-10: LGTM! Well-structured class definition with proper documentation.

The class is well-organized with appropriate namespace organization and documentation.

Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Authentication.cs (1)

6-37: Verify consistency with other authentication implementations.

Let's ensure this authentication enum aligns with any existing authentication implementations in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Authentication enum implementation is consistent across all HTTP components

The implementation aligns perfectly with all other HTTP components in the codebase, maintaining the same enum values, order, and semantic meaning. The detailed XML comments in this implementation provide additional clarity without affecting functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other authentication-related enums or similar implementations
echo "Searching for other authentication implementations..."
rg -t cs "enum.*Authentication" --glob '!**/obj/**' --glob '!**/bin/**'

echo "Searching for authentication-related classes..."
rg -t cs "class.*Authentication" --glob '!**/obj/**' --glob '!**/bin/**'

# Search for similar authentication method usage
echo "Searching for authentication method usage..."
ast-grep --pattern 'enum Authentication { $$$ }'

Length of output: 1147


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Compare the contents of Authentication enums across different components
echo "=== Authentication enum in UploadFile ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Definitions/Authentication.cs

echo -e "\n=== Authentication enum in RequestBytes ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.RequestBytes/Frends.HTTP.RequestBytes/Definitions/Authentication.cs

echo -e "\n=== Authentication enum in DownloadFile ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.DownloadFile/Frends.HTTP.DownloadFile/Definitions/Enums.cs

echo -e "\n=== Authentication enum in SendBytes ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.SendBytes/Frends.HTTP.SendBytes/Definitions/Authentication.cs

echo -e "\n=== Authentication enum in Request ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.Request/Frends.HTTP.Request/Definitions/Authentication.cs

echo -e "\n=== Authentication enum in SendAndReceiveBytes ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.SendAndReceiveBytes/Frends.HTTP.SendAndReceiveBytes/Definitions/Authentication.cs

Length of output: 6053

Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs (1)

1-11: Well-organized imports and namespace structure!

The imports cover all necessary functionality for HTTP mocking, testing, and file operations.

Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.cs (2)

105-105: Validate HTTP method conversion to string

Ensure that input.Method.ToString() correctly converts the HTTP method enum to the appropriate string value accepted by HttpMethod.

If input.Method is an enum, confirm that its ToString() method returns standard HTTP method names like "GET", "POST", etc.


93-103: Ensure proper addition of headers to request and content

While adding headers, the current approach may not add headers as expected if they are restricted. It's important to verify whether headers are correctly assigned to either the request or content headers.

Please run the following script to check headers added to the request:

✅ Verification successful

Headers are properly handled with fallback mechanism

The current implementation correctly handles header addition by:

  • Attempting to add to request headers first
  • Falling back to content headers if request headers fail
  • Using TryAddWithoutValidation to handle restricted headers
  • Providing appropriate warning messages for debugging
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that headers are correctly added to the request or content.

# Expected: Headers should appear in either request or content headers.

# List all headers added to the request
rg -A 10 "foreach.*var header in headerDict" -g "*UploadFile.cs"

Length of output: 1492

.github/workflows/UploadFile_release.yml (1)

1-12: LGTM! Verify secret availability.

The release workflow is well-structured and follows best practices by reusing the organization's standard release workflow.

✅ Verification successful

Proceed with implementation, secret is managed at organization level

The workflow correctly references the organization's standard release workflow in FrendsPlatform/FrendsTasks repository. The required secret (TASKS_FEED_API_KEY) is managed at that level and doesn't need to be configured in this repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the required secret is configured
gh api /repos/FrendsPlatform/FrendsTasks/actions/secrets/TASKS_FEED_API_KEY --jq '.name' || echo "Secret TASKS_FEED_API_KEY not found"

Length of output: 381


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow run history and documentation
echo "=== Checking workflow runs ==="
gh run list --workflow=UploadFile_release.yml --limit 5 --json conclusion,status

echo -e "\n=== Checking documentation ==="
fd -g "README*" -X cat

Length of output: 6214

.github/workflows/UploadFile_build_and_test_on_push.yml (1)

1-18: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration.

The workflow is properly configured with appropriate triggers, branch exclusions, and secret management.

README.md (1)

12-12: LGTM! Documentation update is consistent.

The new task is properly documented following the established pattern.

Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests.csproj (1)

10-20: Verify package versions for security vulnerabilities.

Some packages are using older versions. Please verify there are no known security vulnerabilities:

  • HttpMock (2.3.1)
  • Kayak (0.7.2)
  • System.Net.Http (4.3.4)
✅ Verification successful

All package versions are secure

The specified packages show no known security vulnerabilities:

  • System.Net.Http (4.3.4) is at the patched version
  • HttpMock (2.3.1) and Kayak (0.7.2) have no reported vulnerabilities
  • These are test-only dependencies which further reduces security impact
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities in NuGet packages
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "System.Net.Http") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 2443


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for known vulnerabilities in NuGet packages
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "HttpMock") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}' && \
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  securityVulnerabilities(first: 10, ecosystem: NUGET, package: "Kayak") {
    nodes {
      advisory {
        summary
        severity
        publishedAt
      }
      vulnerableVersionRange
      firstPatchedVersion {
        identifier
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 685

/// }
/// ]]>
/// </example>
public Dictionary<string, string> Headers { get; set; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Use case-insensitive dictionary for headers

HTTP headers are case-insensitive. Use Dictionary<string, string>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase) to ensure proper header matching.

-    public Dictionary<string, string> Headers { get; set; }
+    public IDictionary<string, string> Headers { get; set; } = 
+        new Dictionary<string, string>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public Dictionary<string, string> Headers { get; set; }
public IDictionary<string, string> Headers { get; set; } =
new Dictionary<string, string>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);

Comment on lines +28 to +32
/// {
/// "Content-Type": "application/json",
/// "Cache-Control": "no-cache",
/// "X-Auth-Token": "abcdef123456"
/// }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove sensitive information from documentation

The example contains a potentially sensitive X-Auth-Token value. Replace it with a clearly fake placeholder value.

 {
     "Content-Type": "application/json",
     "Cache-Control": "no-cache",
-    "X-Auth-Token": "abcdef123456"
+    "X-Auth-Token": "<token>"
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/// {
/// "Content-Type": "application/json",
/// "Cache-Control": "no-cache",
/// "X-Auth-Token": "abcdef123456"
/// }
/// {
/// "Content-Type": "application/json",
/// "Cache-Control": "no-cache",
/// "X-Auth-Token": "<token>"
/// }
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)

31-31: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

Comment on lines +13 to +16
/// <summary>
/// Basic authentication is used, where the username and password are sent in plain text.
/// </summary>
Basic,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Mark Basic authentication as obsolete or add security warning.

Basic authentication sends credentials in plain text and should only be used over HTTPS. Consider either marking it as obsolete or adding a security warning in the documentation.

Add a security warning like this:

 /// <summary>
 /// Basic authentication is used, where the username and password are sent in plain text.
+/// WARNING: Only use Basic authentication over HTTPS to prevent credential exposure.
 /// </summary>
+[System.Obsolete("Basic authentication is insecure. Consider using OAuth or ClientCertificate instead.")]
 Basic,
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/// <summary>
/// Basic authentication is used, where the username and password are sent in plain text.
/// </summary>
Basic,
/// <summary>
/// Basic authentication is used, where the username and password are sent in plain text.
/// WARNING: Only use Basic authentication over HTTPS to prevent credential exposure.
/// </summary>
[System.Obsolete("Basic authentication is insecure. Consider using OAuth or ClientCertificate instead.")]
Basic,

Comment on lines 27 to 30
var filePath = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "../../..", "Test_files", "test_file.txt"));
var codePageName = "iso-8859-1";
var utf8ByteArray = File.ReadAllBytes(filePath);
var expectedContentType = $"text/plain; charset={codePageName}";
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve file path handling and file operations.

Several improvements needed for better reliability:

  1. Use Path.Combine() with project-relative paths instead of hard-coded directory traversal
  2. Add file existence check
  3. Use async file operations
-var filePath = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "../../..", "Test_files", "test_file.txt"));
+var filePath = Path.Combine(TestContext.CurrentContext.TestDirectory, "Test_files", "test_file.txt");
+Assert.That(File.Exists(filePath), Is.True, "Test file not found");
-var utf8ByteArray = File.ReadAllBytes(filePath);
+var utf8ByteArray = await File.ReadAllBytesAsync(filePath);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 13 to 50
[TestFixture]
public class IntegrationTest
{
private IHttpServer _stubHttp;

[SetUp]
public void Setup()
{
_stubHttp = HttpMockRepository.At("http://localhost:9191");
}

[Test]
public async Task RequestShouldSetEncodingWithContentTypeCharsetIgnoringCase()
{
var filePath = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "../../..", "Test_files", "test_file.txt"));
var codePageName = "iso-8859-1";
var utf8ByteArray = File.ReadAllBytes(filePath);
var expectedContentType = $"text/plain; charset={codePageName}";

_stubHttp.Stub(x => x.Post("/endpoint"))
.AsContentType($"text/plain; charset={codePageName}")
.Return("foo ���")
.OK();

var contentType = new Header { Name = "cONTENT-tYpE", Value = expectedContentType };
var input = new Input { Method = Method.POST, Url = "http://localhost:9191/endpoint", Headers = new Header[1] { contentType }, FilePath = filePath };
var options = new Options { ConnectionTimeoutSeconds = 60 };
var result = await UploadFileTask.UploadFile(input, options, CancellationToken.None);
var request = _stubHttp.AssertWasCalled(called => called.Post("/endpoint")).LastRequest();
var requestHead = request.RequestHead;
var requestBodyByteArray = Encoding.GetEncoding(codePageName).GetBytes(request.Body);
var requestContentType = requestHead.Headers["cONTENT-tYpE"];

//Casing should not affect setting header.
Assert.That(requestContentType, Is.EqualTo(expectedContentType));
Assert.That(requestBodyByteArray, Is.EqualTo(utf8ByteArray));
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

The review comment is accurate - test coverage needs significant improvement

The implementation has error handling for several scenarios that are currently untested:

  • HTTP error responses (ThrowExceptionOnErrorResponse option)
  • Authentication with domain\username format
  • Certificate handling and validation
  • File not found scenarios

Additionally, the suggested scenarios from the review (large files, different content types, error scenarios, cancellation) are also missing.

🔗 Analysis chain

Consider adding more test scenarios.

The current test covers the basic case, but consider adding tests for:

  1. Large file uploads to verify streaming behavior
  2. Different content types (e.g., binary files, images)
  3. Error scenarios (network timeout, server errors)
  4. Cancellation token handling

Let me help you verify the current test coverage:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all test methods in the test files
echo "Current test coverage:"
rg -l "public.*async.*Task.*Test" --type cs

# Look for existing error handling tests
echo -e "\nError handling coverage:"
rg "ThrowsAsync|Should.*Throw" --type cs

Length of output: 3832


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search specifically for UploadFile tests
echo "UploadFile test coverage:"
rg -t cs "class.*Test" "Frends.HTTP.UploadFile"

echo -e "\nTest methods in UploadFile:"
rg -t cs "public.*async.*Task.*Test|public.*void.*Test" "Frends.HTTP.UploadFile"

echo -e "\nError handling in UploadFile:"
rg -t cs "throw|catch|Exception" "Frends.HTTP.UploadFile"

Length of output: 1551

Comment on lines +31 to +35
/// <summary>
/// List of HTTP headers to be added to the request.
/// </summary>
/// <example>Name: Header, Value: HeaderValue</example>
public Header[] Headers { get; set; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add validation for HTTP headers to prevent injection.

The Headers property needs validation to prevent header injection and ensure proper formatting.

     /// </summary>
     /// <example>Name: Header, Value: HeaderValue</example>
+    [ValidateHeaderArray(ErrorMessage = "Invalid headers")]
     public Header[] Headers { get; set; }

Create a custom validation attribute:

public class ValidateHeaderArrayAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
    public override bool IsValid(object value)
    {
        if (value is Header[] headers)
        {
            foreach (var header in headers)
            {
                if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(header.Name) ||
                    header.Name.Any(ch => ch <= 32 || ch >= 127) ||
                    header.Value?.Any(ch => ch <= 31 || ch >= 127) == true)
                {
                    return false;
                }
            }
        }
        return true;
    }
}

Comment on lines +9 to +10
public class Input
{
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input validation attributes to ensure data integrity.

Consider adding validation attributes to enforce required properties and their constraints. This will help prevent runtime errors from missing or invalid input.

 /// </summary>
+[Serializable]
 public class Input
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public class Input
{
[Serializable]
public class Input
{

Comment on lines +17 to +23
/// <summary>
/// The URL with protocol and path. You can include query parameters directly in the url.
/// </summary>
/// <example>https://example.org/path/to</example>
[DefaultValue("https://example.org/path/to")]
[DisplayFormat(DataFormatString = "Text")]
public string Url { get; set; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance URL validation for security and correctness.

The URL property needs additional validation to ensure security and proper formatting.

     /// </summary>
     /// <example>https://example.org/path/to</example>
     [DefaultValue("https://example.org/path/to")]
     [DisplayFormat(DataFormatString = "Text")]
+    [Required(ErrorMessage = "URL is required")]
+    [RegularExpression(@"^https?:\/\/.*", ErrorMessage = "URL must start with http:// or https://")]
+    [StringLength(2048, ErrorMessage = "URL length cannot exceed 2048 characters")]
+    [Url(ErrorMessage = "Invalid URL format")]
     public string Url { get; set; }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/// <summary>
/// The URL with protocol and path. You can include query parameters directly in the url.
/// </summary>
/// <example>https://example.org/path/to</example>
[DefaultValue("https://example.org/path/to")]
[DisplayFormat(DataFormatString = "Text")]
public string Url { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// The URL with protocol and path. You can include query parameters directly in the url.
/// </summary>
/// <example>https://example.org/path/to</example>
[DefaultValue("https://example.org/path/to")]
[DisplayFormat(DataFormatString = "Text")]
[Required(ErrorMessage = "URL is required")]
[RegularExpression(@"^https?:\/\/.*", ErrorMessage = "URL must start with http:// or https://")]
[StringLength(2048, ErrorMessage = "URL length cannot exceed 2048 characters")]
[Url(ErrorMessage = "Invalid URL format")]
public string Url { get; set; }

Comment on lines +25 to +29
/// <summary>
/// The file path to be posted
/// </summary>
/// <example>C:\Users</example>
public string FilePath { get; set; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical security validations needed for file handling

The implementation confirms the need for security measures. Current code reads files without any validation, potentially exposing several vulnerabilities:

  • No path traversal protection
  • Missing file existence validation
  • Loads entire file into memory without size limits (potential DoS)
  • No file access permission checks

The suggested property validations and runtime checks are necessary. Additionally, consider:

  • Implementing streaming for large files instead of File.ReadAllBytes
  • Adding configurable file size limits
  • Validating file existence before attempting to read
🔗 Analysis chain

Add critical security validations for file path.

The FilePath property requires validation to prevent security vulnerabilities like path traversal and to ensure proper file handling.

     /// </summary>
     /// <example>C:\Users</example>
+    [Required(ErrorMessage = "File path is required")]
+    [RegularExpression(@"^[^<>:""/\\|?*]+$", ErrorMessage = "File path contains invalid characters")]
+    [StringLength(260, ErrorMessage = "File path exceeds maximum length")]
     public string FilePath { get; set; }

Additionally, implement runtime validation in the task execution to:

  1. Verify file existence
  2. Check file size limits
  3. Validate file permissions
  4. Prevent path traversal attacks
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the implementation includes file validation
rg -l "File\.(Exists|Length)" Frends.HTTP.UploadFile

Length of output: 54


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for file upload implementation and validation patterns
echo "=== Searching for file handling code ==="
rg -l "new FileStream|File\." Frends.HTTP.UploadFile

echo -e "\n=== Searching for HTTP upload implementation ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'public static async Task<Output> UploadFile($$$)'

echo -e "\n=== Checking for validation patterns ==="
rg "throw new|Exception|validate|check" Frends.HTTP.UploadFile -A 2

Length of output: 3090


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the main implementation file
echo "=== Main implementation file content ==="
cat Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.cs

echo -e "\n=== Searching for file stream handling ==="
rg "new (FileStream|StreamContent)" Frends.HTTP.UploadFile -A 3

Length of output: 5880

Comment on lines +11 to +15
/// <summary>
/// The HTTP Method to be used with the request.
/// </summary>
/// <example>GET</example>
public Method Method { get; set; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add validation and default value for the Method property.

The Method property should be required and have a default value to prevent undefined behavior.

     /// </summary>
     /// <example>GET</example>
+    [Required(ErrorMessage = "HTTP Method is required")]
+    [DefaultValue(Method.POST)]
     public Method Method { get; set; }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
/// <summary>
/// The HTTP Method to be used with the request.
/// </summary>
/// <example>GET</example>
public Method Method { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// The HTTP Method to be used with the request.
/// </summary>
/// <example>GET</example>
[Required(ErrorMessage = "HTTP Method is required")]
[DefaultValue(Method.POST)]
public Method Method { get; set; }

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs (1)

19-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve file path handling to ensure test reliability

Using Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "../../..", "Test_files", "test_file.txt") relies on a specific directory structure and may lead to issues when the tests are run in different environments. Consider using TestContext.CurrentContext.TestDirectory to make the path resolution more robust.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

- private static readonly string testFilePath = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "../../..", "Test_files", "test_file.txt"));
+ private static readonly string testFilePath = Path.Combine(TestContext.CurrentContext.TestDirectory, "Test_files", "test_file.txt");
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/CertificateHandler.cs (1)

8-11: Add XML documentation for better maintainability.

The public API would benefit from XML documentation explaining:

  • The purpose of the method
  • Parameter descriptions and constraints
  • Return value meaning
  • When null is returned
  • Possible exceptions

Add documentation like this:

+/// <summary>
+/// Handles creation and cleanup of self-signed certificates for testing.
+/// </summary>
+/// <param name="path">File path where the certificate will be saved</param>
+/// <param name="password">Password to protect the certificate</param>
+/// <param name="cleanUp">When true, removes the certificate; when false, creates a new one</param>
+/// <param name="thumbPrint">Certificate thumbprint for cleanup operations</param>
+/// <returns>The thumbprint of the created certificate, or null if cleaning up</returns>
+/// <exception cref="Exception">Thrown when certificate operations fail</exception>
 public static string Handle(string path, string password, bool cleanUp, string thumbPrint)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 139e48b and dcbb9fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/CertificateHandler.cs (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests.csproj (1 hunks)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests.csproj
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (csharp)
  • GitHub Check: build / Build on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: build / Code Quality Check
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/IntegrationTest.cs (3)

50-50: Use asynchronous file operations

For consistency and to prevent blocking the thread, consider using the asynchronous method ReadAllBytesAsync when reading the test file.

Apply this diff:

- var utf8ByteArray = File.ReadAllBytes(testFilePath);
+ var utf8ByteArray = await File.ReadAllBytesAsync(testFilePath);

Ensure the test method is marked with async and any necessary changes are made to accommodate the asynchronous call.


47-188: Extend test coverage to include additional scenarios

While the current tests cover basic functionality and some authentication methods, consider adding tests for the following scenarios to improve test coverage:

  1. Large file uploads: Test uploading large files to verify that the upload process handles large data streams correctly.
  2. Different content types: Test uploading files with different content types (e.g., binary files, images) to ensure that content type headers and encoding are handled properly.
  3. Error scenarios: Include tests for network timeouts, server errors, and other failure modes to ensure that the task handles errors gracefully.
  4. Cancellation token handling: Add tests to verify that the operation correctly responds to cancellation requests via the CancellationToken.

139-140: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify the format of the Windows Authentication username

The username for Windows Authentication should typically be in the format domain\\username. Currently, it is set as Username = "user\\domain", which appears to be reversed.

Please verify that the username is correctly formatted and that the authentication works as expected.

}

[Test]
public async Task AddClientCertiface()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the method name typo

The method name AddClientCertiface appears to have a typo. It should likely be AddClientCertificate.

Apply this diff to fix the typo:

- public async Task AddClientCertiface()
+ public async Task AddClientCertificate()
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public async Task AddClientCertiface()
public async Task AddClientCertificate()

{
string certPath = Path.GetFullPath(Path.Combine(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory, "../../..", "Test_files", "certwithpk.pfx"));
string certPassword = "password";
var thumprint = CertificateHandler.Handle(certPath, certPassword, false, null);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix variable name typo

The variable thumprint is misspelled. It should be thumbprint.

Apply this diff:

- var thumprint = CertificateHandler.Handle(certPath, certPassword, false, null);
+ var thumbprint = CertificateHandler.Handle(certPath, certPassword, false, null);

Also, update the usage in line 169 accordingly:

- CertificateThumbprint = thumprint
+ CertificateThumbprint = thumbprint
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
var thumprint = CertificateHandler.Handle(certPath, certPassword, false, null);
var thumbprint = CertificateHandler.Handle(certPath, certPassword, false, null);

Comment on lines +19 to +27
X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Increase certificate validity period for test reliability.

The certificate is valid for only 1 minute which could cause tests to fail if they run longer. Consider increasing the validity period for more reliable testing.

-                        ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
+                        ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddHours(1),
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
});
X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddHours(1),
});

Comment on lines +40 to +50
else
{
using X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite | OpenFlags.IncludeArchived);
X509Certificate2Collection col = store.Certificates.Find(X509FindType.FindByThumbprint, thumbPrint, false);

foreach (var cert in col)
store.Remove(cert);

return null;
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance cleanup operation safety and logging.

The cleanup operation lacks parameter validation and logging. It could silently fail or remove multiple certificates.

Add validation and logging:

             else
             {
+                if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(thumbPrint))
+                    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(thumbPrint));
+
                 using X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
                 store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite | OpenFlags.IncludeArchived);
                 X509Certificate2Collection col = store.Certificates.Find(X509FindType.FindByThumbprint, thumbPrint, false);
+
+                if (col.Count == 0)
+                    Console.WriteLine($"Warning: No certificates found with thumbprint {thumbPrint}");
+                else if (col.Count > 1)
+                    Console.WriteLine($"Warning: Found {col.Count} certificates with thumbprint {thumbPrint}");
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
else
{
using X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite | OpenFlags.IncludeArchived);
X509Certificate2Collection col = store.Certificates.Find(X509FindType.FindByThumbprint, thumbPrint, false);
foreach (var cert in col)
store.Remove(cert);
return null;
}
else
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(thumbPrint))
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(thumbPrint));
using X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite | OpenFlags.IncludeArchived);
X509Certificate2Collection col = store.Certificates.Find(X509FindType.FindByThumbprint, thumbPrint, false);
if (col.Count == 0)
Console.WriteLine($"Warning: No certificates found with thumbprint {thumbPrint}");
else if (col.Count > 1)
Console.WriteLine($"Warning: Found {col.Count} certificates with thumbprint {thumbPrint}");
foreach (var cert in col)
store.Remove(cert);
return null;
}

Comment on lines +52 to +55
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new Exception(ex.Message);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Improve exception handling to preserve stack traces.

The current error handling loses valuable stack trace information and doesn't handle cleanup properly.

Modify the exception handling:

-        catch (Exception ex)
-        {
-            throw new Exception(ex.Message);
-        }
+        catch (Exception ex) when (ex is not ArgumentNullException)
+        {
+            throw new InvalidOperationException("Certificate operation failed", ex);
+        }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new Exception(ex.Message);
}
catch (Exception ex) when (ex is not ArgumentNullException)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Certificate operation failed", ex);
}

Comment on lines +14 to +38
if (!cleanUp)
{
using CryptContext ctx = new();
ctx.Open();

X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
});

byte[] certData = cert.Export(X509ContentType.Pfx, password);

using (X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser))
{
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite);
store.Add(cert);
}

File.WriteAllBytes(path, certData);
return cert.Thumbprint;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input parameter validation.

The method should validate input parameters before proceeding with certificate creation.

Add these checks at the start of the creation block:

             if (!cleanUp)
             {
+                if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(path))
+                    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(path));
+                if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(password))
+                    throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(password));
+
                 using CryptContext ctx = new();
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (!cleanUp)
{
using CryptContext ctx = new();
ctx.Open();
X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
});
byte[] certData = cert.Export(X509ContentType.Pfx, password);
using (X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser))
{
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite);
store.Add(cert);
}
File.WriteAllBytes(path, certData);
return cert.Thumbprint;
if (!cleanUp)
{
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(path))
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(path));
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(password))
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(password));
using CryptContext ctx = new();
ctx.Open();
X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
});
byte[] certData = cert.Export(X509ContentType.Pfx, password);
using (X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser))
{
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite);
store.Add(cert);
}
File.WriteAllBytes(path, certData);
return cert.Thumbprint;

Comment on lines +16 to +35
using CryptContext ctx = new();
ctx.Open();

X509Certificate2 cert = ctx.CreateSelfSignedCertificate(
new SelfSignedCertProperties
{
IsPrivateKeyExportable = true,
KeyBitLength = 4096,
Name = new X500DistinguishedName("cn=localhost"),
ValidFrom = DateTime.Today.AddDays(-1),
ValidTo = DateTime.Today.AddMinutes(1),
});

byte[] certData = cert.Export(X509ContentType.Pfx, password);

using (X509Store store = new(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser))
{
store.Open(OpenFlags.ReadWrite);
store.Add(cert);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Certificate cleanup is missing from test implementations

The test code adds certificates to the CurrentUser store but doesn't clean them up:

  • No certificate removal from store in test cleanup methods
  • Only file system cleanup is implemented
  • Certificates remain in the user's store even after tests complete

Recommendations:

  • Add certificate store cleanup in test cleanup methods using store.Remove(cert)
  • Consider using a dedicated test store location
  • Track certificate thumbprints for cleanup
🔗 Analysis chain

Review security implications of test certificates.

While this is test code, there are several security considerations to be aware of:

  1. Certificates are created with exportable private keys
  2. Certificates are stored in the user's certificate store
  3. The cleanup process is critical to prevent certificate accumulation

Consider adding a finally block to ensure cleanup runs even if tests fail.

Run this script to check for leftover test certificates:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential leftover test certificates
rg -l "ctx\.CreateSelfSignedCertificate" | xargs -I {} rg -A 5 "Name = new X500DistinguishedName\(\"cn=localhost\"\)" {}

Length of output: 734


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for certificate store cleanup mechanisms
rg -B 5 -A 10 "store\.Add\(cert\)" 

Length of output: 3660


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for test cleanup or disposal methods
rg -B 2 -A 10 "public void (Dispose|Cleanup|TearDown)|protected override void Dispose" Frends.HTTP.*Tests/

Length of output: 170


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for test cleanup methods in both projects
echo "=== UploadFile Tests ==="
rg -B 2 -A 10 "public void (Dispose|Cleanup|TearDown)|protected override void Dispose|\[TestCleanup\]" Frends.HTTP.UploadFile/Frends.HTTP.UploadFile.Tests/

echo -e "\n=== DownloadFile Tests ==="
rg -B 2 -A 10 "public void (Dispose|Cleanup|TearDown)|protected override void Dispose|\[TestCleanup\]" Frends.HTTP.DownloadFile/Frends.HTTP.DownloadFile.Tests/

Length of output: 1851

@MatteoDelOmbra MatteoDelOmbra requested a review from jefim January 10, 2025 13:25
@MatteoDelOmbra MatteoDelOmbra self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Frends.HTTP.UploadFile
2 participants