-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SS4 compatibility #11
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 11.6% 75.72% +64.12%
- Complexity 0 29 +29
=============================================
Files 238 5 -233
Lines 42478 103 -42375
=============================================
- Hits 4929 78 -4851
+ Misses 37549 25 -37524
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Require guzzle Clean up and refactor. Clean code. Be a tidy Dutchy Badges badges badges badges, mushroom mushroom!
Why is CodeClimate taking Framework in to account? :| |
composer.json
Outdated
} | ||
}, | ||
"target-dir": "stripeslack" | ||
"extra": { | ||
"installer-name": "stripeslack" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're missing expose
here for your image directory
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, good one, should be fixed by now :)
The recipe is one way of installing the CMS, but not the only way. This change also fixes situations where the silverstripe/recipe-cms ^4 has been installed, rather than ^1 (the numbering of which was a bug)
The action needs to be public.
FIX: Bind to package, not recipe
Unacceptable! Needs squashy!