Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Xero] Update UpdatePolicyConnectionConfiguration to 1:1:1 - Part 1 #48492

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 13, 2024

Conversation

mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@mananjadhav mananjadhav commented Sep 3, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #47443
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Prerequisite:
Your workspace need to connect with Xero.

  1. Go to the selected workspace
  2. Click on Accounting
  3. Go to Import -> Chart of Accounts -> toggle the Enabled switch for categories. Ensure it works as before.
  4. Go to Import -> Re-bill customers -> toggle the Import switch for customers. Ensure it works as before.
  5. Go to Export -> Preferred Exporter -> from the list change the exporter -> Ensure it is reflected back in the preferred exporter list.
  6. Go to Export -> Purchase bill date -> choose the options from the list. Ensure that the selected values are reflected in the list.
  7. Go to Export -> Purchase status -> choose the options from the list. Ensure that the selected values are reflected in the. list.
  8. Go to Export -> Xero bank account -> choose one of the bank accounts from the list. Ensure that the selected values are reflected in the list.
  9. Go to Advanced -> Auto sync -> toggle the Auto-sync switch. Ensure it works as before.
  10. Go to Advanced -> Sync reimbursed reports -> toggle the Sync reimbursed reports switch. Ensure it works as before.
  11. Go to Advanced -> Xero bill payment account -> choose one of the bank accounts from the list. Ensure that the selected values are reflected in the list.
  12. Go to Advanced -> Xero invoice collections account -> choose one of the bank accounts from the list. Ensure that the selected values are reflected in the list.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  • Verify for all the steps the offline behavior works as before.

QA Steps

  • Same as Test steps.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-xero-update-apis.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mweb-chrome-xero-update-apis.mov
iOS: Native
ios-xero-update-apis.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari-xero-update-apis.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web-xero-export-import-options.mp4
web-xero-advanced-options.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop-xero-export-import-options.mov

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ishpaul777 You can start with the review if you want. I'll finish this checklist today.

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

sorry missed the ping, i'll put this on my list, expect to review this end of today/over the weekend

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

@mananjadhav please resolve conflict when you get chance

@mananjadhav mananjadhav marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2024 23:02
@mananjadhav mananjadhav requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2024 23:02
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ishpaul777 and removed request for a team September 8, 2024 23:02
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2024

@ishpaul777 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ishpaul777 I am facing an issue with UpdateXeroSyncSyncReimbursedReports which I've raised here. The rest of it you can review.

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Sep 10, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-09-13.at.10.48.49.PM.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-09-13.at.10.09.32.PM.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-09-13.at.10.34.20.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-09-11.at.2.03.05.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-09-11.at.1.42.19.AM-1.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-09-13.at.11.00.18.PM-1.mov

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Sep 10, 2024

bug: Pending update grayed out pattern is not working on Export -> Purchase status, ig exist on main also possibly a easy fix

Screen.Recording.2024-09-11.at.12.52.36.AM.mov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB, I suggest we seperate actions in different files advanced/import/export for easy navigation and readability

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did think about it but didn't see a huge upside, considering we won't have too many other commands that'll be added. Let me know if you feel strongly about it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't feel too strongly about it either, but it could be a nice-to-have improvement for readability. I'm okay with leaving it as is, thoughts @dangrous ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that's interesting - I don't think there will be any new settings/commands we'll need to add... but it would definitely make it a lot more reader-friendly. Maybe if it's quick to do so, @mananjadhav, we add it in? But if it'll take a while I don't think it's necessary.

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 I am facing an issue with UpdateXeroSyncSyncReimbursedReports which I've raised here. The rest of it you can review.

Posted on the issue too but this should be fixed on staging!

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes I'll test it now.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bug: Pending update grayed out pattern is not working on Export -> Purchase status, ig exist on main also possibly a easy fix

I'll take a look today

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

finishing this today, only left with videos for all platforms

@dangrous
Copy link
Contributor

how are we looking here? do you think we can get this merged today?

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Sep 13, 2024

yes i am on it, was struggling with the android build, but now its sorted. Sorry for delay 🙇

Copy link
Contributor

@ishpaul777 ishpaul777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from dangrous September 13, 2024 17:34
Copy link
Contributor

@dangrous dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

@dangrous dangrous merged commit 4039a12 into Expensify:main Sep 13, 2024
19 of 20 checks passed
@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

ishpaul777 commented Sep 13, 2024

@dangrous can you also create a issue for #48492 (comment) since its still reproducable, i can raise a quick fix for it

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 9.0.35-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/grgia in version: 9.0.35-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants