Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Free trial] Implement Restricted Action screen #43855

Conversation

pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro commented Jun 17, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$#43673
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

Since there are three variants of the restricted action screen, which are shown to the user depending on his workspace role, you'll need to test each of the following scenarios:

Scenario A - Workspace User

  1. Create a new workspace with a different account
  2. Invite your primary account to the workspace
  3. On your primary account, go to the workspace page and get the policy ID from the URL
  4. Navigate to /restricted-action/workspace/<policyID> passing the policy ID you got from previous step
  5. Ensure the screen is opened and the UI is correct
  6. Click the Chat with your admin button, ensure you were navigated to the workspace chat.

Scenario B - Workspace Admin

  1. Create a new workspace with a different account
  2. Invite your primary account to the workspace, then promote yourself to admin
  3. On your primary account, go to the workspace page and get the policy ID from the URL
  4. Navigate to /restricted-action/workspace/<policyID> passing the policy ID you got from previous step
  5. Ensure the screen is opened and the UI is correct
  6. Click the Chat in #admins button, ensure you were navigated to the workspace admins chat.

Scenario C - Workspace Owner

  1. Create a new workspace
  2. Go to the workspace page and get the policy ID from the URL
  3. Navigate to /restricted-action/workspace/<policyID> passing the policy ID you got from previous step
  4. Ensure the screen is opened and the UI is correct
  5. Click the Add payment card button, ensure you were navigated to the Subscription screen.

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Workspace User

Android.-.Native.-.User.mp4

Workspace Admin

Android.-.Native.-.Admin.mp4

Workspace Owner

Android.-.Native.-.Owner.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome

Workspace User

Android.-.Chrome.-.User.mp4

Workspace Admin

Android.-.Chrome.-.Admin.mp4

Workspace Owner

Android.-.Chrome.-.Owner.mp4
iOS: Native

Workspace User

iOS.-.Native.-.User.mp4

Workspace Admin

iOS.-.Native.-.Admin.mp4

Workspace Owner

iOS.-.Native.-.Owner.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari

Workspace User

iOS.-.Safari.-.User.mp4

Workspace Admin

iOS.-.Safari.-.Admin.mp4

Workspace Owner

iOS.-.Safari.-.Owner.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Workspace User

MacOS.-.Chrome.-.User.mp4

Workspace Admin

MacOS.-.Chrome.-.Admin.mp4

Workspace Owner

MacOS.-.Chrome.-.Owner.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

Workspace User

MacOS.-.Native.-.User.mp4

Workspace Admin

MacOS.-.Native.-.Admin.mp4

Workspace Owner

MacOS.-.Native.-.Owner.mp4

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro requested review from a team as code owners June 17, 2024 17:42
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from hoangzinh and removed request for a team June 17, 2024 17:42
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 17, 2024

@hoangzinh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@rezkiy37 rezkiy37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

left comments

src/languages/es.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro changed the title [Free trial] Implement Restricted Action screen [WIP][Free trial] Implement Restricted Action screen Jun 18, 2024
@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro marked this pull request as draft June 18, 2024 11:36
src/languages/en.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -2721,6 +2721,18 @@ export default {
errorDescriptionPartTwo: 'contacta con el conserje',
errorDescriptionPartThree: 'por ayuda.',
},
restrictedAction: {
restricted: 'Restringido',
actionsAreCurrentlyRestricted: ({ workspaceName }) => `Los gastos para ${workspaceName} están actualmente restringidos`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pac-guerreiro Please resolve this comment once you update the spanish translation with the correct text.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The word in the ES file for workspace is espacio de trabajo

So this would be:

Los gastos para {workspace_name} espacio de trabajo están actualmente restringidos

CC: @Gonals to quickly confirm.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Los gastos para el espacio de trabajo {workspace_name} están actualmente restringidos

😁

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Gonals Muchas gracias! 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah coming back here - the copy for this has an additional change that was made in the design doc reviews --

Instead of "Los gastos para el espacio de trabajo {workspace_name} están actualmente restringidos", we want to change the copy to "Las acciones en el espacio de trabajo {workspace_name} están actualmente restringidas"

@Gonals - are you able to confirm if that is the correct formatting to say, "Actions on the {workspace_name} workspace are currently restricted" ? I think we'd also need to change the English file for this as well? As initially the design doc had "Expenses to {workspace_name} are currently restricted."

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

English file is correct in the PR it seems:

image

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah coming back here - the copy for this has an additional change that was made in the design doc reviews --

Instead of "Los gastos para el espacio de trabajo {workspace_name} están actualmente restringidos", we want to change the copy to "Las acciones en el espacio de trabajo {workspace_name} están actualmente restringidas"

@Gonals - are you able to confirm if that is the correct formatting to say, "Actions on the {workspace_name} workspace are currently restricted" ? I think we'd also need to change the English file for this as well? As initially the design doc had "Expenses to {workspace_name} are currently restricted."

Yep! All good!

src/libs/ReportUtils.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Can you make sure all of the green buttons are using our large button size? Thanks!

This comment has been minimized.

@chiragsalian chiragsalian self-requested a review June 19, 2024 17:58
@fabioh8010
Copy link
Contributor

@pac-guerreiro We got merge conflicts

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

hoangzinh commented Jun 20, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-06-20.at.18.18.10.android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-06-20.at.18.14.15.android.chrome.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-06-20.at.18.23.02.ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-06-20.at.18.21.52.ios.safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-06-20.at.17.55.47.web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-06-20.at.18.11.00.desktop.mov

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

Bug 1: Text in Spanish is cut off
Screenshot 2024-06-20 at 17 57 32

@pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawnborton any suggestion on how to handle the situation reported above?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

^ Addressed that comment via Slack.

@hoangzinh
Copy link
Contributor

@pac-guerreiro Your turn. We nearly done

@pac-guerreiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hoangzinh sorry for the delay, it's is done! 😄

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from aldo-expensify June 21, 2024 09:40
@aldo-expensify aldo-expensify removed their request for review June 21, 2024 17:15
Copy link
Contributor

@chiragsalian chiragsalian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice, thank you for the changes. Code LGTM. I just left a minor comment update.
Not a blocker so I'll proceed and merge. If possible can you address the comment in a follow up.

@@ -153,6 +153,12 @@ function isExpensifyTeam(email: string | undefined): boolean {
const isPolicyAdmin = (policy: OnyxInputOrEntry<Policy> | EmptyObject, currentUserLogin?: string): boolean =>
(policy?.role ?? (currentUserLogin && policy?.employeeList?.[currentUserLogin]?.role)) === CONST.POLICY.ROLE.ADMIN;

/**
* Checks if the current user is an user of the policy.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find this weird to read current user is an user. Maybe making it more verbose like so would be easier to read,

Suggested change
* Checks if the current user is an user of the policy.
* Checks if the current user is of the role "user" on the policy.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@pac-guerreiro pac-guerreiro Jun 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chiragsalian chiragsalian merged commit 3ef375f into Expensify:main Jun 24, 2024
18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

pac-guerreiro added a commit to callstack-internal/Expensify-App that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/chiragsalian in version: 9.0.2-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 3, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.0.3-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.5-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.