Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

migrate AddDebitCardPage to function component #16284 #22004

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

yh-0218
Copy link
Contributor

@yh-0218 yh-0218 commented Jun 30, 2023

Details

Refactor AddDebitCardPage.js to functional component

Fixed Issues

$ #16284

Tests

  1. Verify that DEBIT CARD menu is opened when click SETTING/Payments/Add Payment Method/Debit Card
  2. Verify that DEBIT CARD info is validated when input DEBIT CARD info
  3. Verify that DEBIT CARD info is sent to backend when click add button
  4. Verify that DEBIT CARD menu is closed when click back button
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-07-01.at.1.27.30.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-07-01.at.1.29.53.AM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-07-01.at.1.34.58.AM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-07-01.at.1.45.53.AM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-07-01.at.1.44.22.AM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-07-01.at.1.32.57.AM.mov

@yh-0218 yh-0218 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 30, 2023 22:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Julesssss and removed request for a team June 30, 2023 22:47
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 30, 2023

@Julesssss Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

It's not a big deal, but the issue was linked incorrectly (it has some [ chars in the URL), so this should have been assigned to @youssef-lr.

Copy link
Contributor

@Julesssss Julesssss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the commits are unsigned. Unfortunately we're unable to merge them so you will need to resubmit a PR after following step 10 here

@yh-0218 yh-0218 removed their assignment Jul 3, 2023
@yh-0218
Copy link
Contributor Author

yh-0218 commented Jul 3, 2023

hi, @Julesssss @youssef-lr
I just pushed code again after run pretter.

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@yh-0218 Your commits are not signed. You need to fix that

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@yh-0218 Please follow the below guideline and setup for signing the commits https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification

Once you've set up check this thread to retroactively sign commits.

@yh-0218
Copy link
Contributor Author

yh-0218 commented Jul 4, 2023

@Santhosh-Sellavel Sorry, I just setup for signing the commits.
Please review my new PR. Thanks.

@yh-0218 yh-0218 closed this Jul 4, 2023
@yh-0218 yh-0218 deleted the ana-funcCompMigrate-16284 branch July 4, 2023 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants