Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the navigation to chat group member profiles #20612

Merged

Conversation

PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv commented Jun 12, 2023

Details

If you create a group it will show all the member emails/profiles + a welcome message
image

If you click on any member mentioned there it should take you to that member's profile page (where you can check that user's public info and choose to chat 1:1 with them).

This P.R. fixes a bug where refreshing the page would change the order of some internal arrays causing this feature to navigate you to the wrong profile.

Fixed Issues

$ #20583
PROPOSAL: GH_LINK_ISSUE(COMMENT)

Tests

  1. Start a group chat and make sure to include
    • An SMS/phoneNumber account
    • An account with no Display name
    • An account with the display name filled
    • An account that exists and you didn't chat with before
  2. Verify each member is mentioned in the Welcome message and that clicking on their mentions takes you to the correct profile page.
  3. Refresh the page in Web/mWeb and Sign Off then back in for other platforms
  4. Verify that each member link in the Welcome message still takes you to their correct profile page (instead of before where it would take you to the wrong member's profile)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A, this happens after redirecting or signing in and that requires connectivity.

QA Steps

  1. Start a group chat and make sure to include
    • An SMS/phoneNumber account
    • An account with no Display name
    • An account with the display name filled
    • An account that exists and you didn't chat with before
  2. Verify each member is mentioned in the Welcome message and that clicking on their mentions takes you to the correct profile page. (Except for the account you didn't have a chat with before since you don't have connectivity to fetch their info)
  3. Refresh the page in Web/mWeb and Sign Off then back in for other platforms
  4. Verify that each member link in the Welcome message still takes you to their correct profile page (instead of before where it would take you to the wrong member's profile) (Except for the account you didn't have a chat with before since you don't have connectivity to fetch their info)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb.Android.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
ios.mweb.mov
Desktop
Desktop.mov
iOS
iOS.native.mov
Android
Android.mov

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2023 18:13
@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv self-assigned this Jun 12, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from aimane-chnaif and bondydaa and removed request for a team June 12, 2023 18:14
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 12, 2023

@aimane-chnaif @bondydaa One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adding evidences right now!

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think @bondydaa might be OOO so I'll try to re-assign this

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv requested review from a team and removed request for bondydaa June 12, 2023 18:18
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from bondydaa and removed request for a team June 12, 2023 18:18
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 12, 2023

@mananjadhav @bondydaa One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mananjadhav June 12, 2023 18:18
@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Since this is deploy blocker, reviewing now as top priority

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thks so much! I failed to re-assign another internal engineer so will ask if anyone wants to take a look at it internally!

Will un-assign @mananjadhav sorry for that!!

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv removed the request for review from mananjadhav June 12, 2023 18:21
@mountiny mountiny self-requested a review June 12, 2023 18:26
mountiny
mountiny previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aimane-chnaif let us know once done with testing

Comment on lines 101 to 104
const accountDetails = props.personalDetails[OptionsListUtils.addSMSDomainIfPhoneNumber(displayNamesWithTooltips[index].tooltip)];
if (accountDetails && accountDetails.accountID) {
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.getProfileRoute(accountDetails.accountID));
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tagging @Beamanator as I believe this might have to be included in your refactor PR

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we have a problem with this fix! I'm checking right now and I think personalDetails doesn't have new contact data, so creating a group with a new Contact breaks this!

I think I'll have to use another object other than personalDetails!

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

I changed the logic to search for the email/login index in participants then grab the id from participantAccountIDs and now I'm testing!

onPress={() => {
    const participantIndex = _.indexOf(participants, OptionsListUtils.addSMSDomainIfPhoneNumber(displayNamesWithTooltips[index].tooltip));
    if (participantIndex > -1) {
        Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.getProfileRoute(participantAccountIDs[participantIndex]));
    }
}}

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

I think we have a problem with this fix! I'm checking right now and I think personalDetails doesn't have new contact data, so creating a group with a new Contact breaks this!

I think I'll have to use another object other than personalDetails!

This works fine for me in online but not offline.
Is it possible to get accountID from login without fetching from backend?

Screen.Recording.2023-06-12.at.7.42.36.PM.mov

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

This works fine for me in online but not offline.
Is it possible to get accountID from login without fetching from backend?

Double checking that right now!
Maybe this is happening when the account also doesn't exist, saying that because I'm seeing some new bugs with this other approach that indicate that.

Is it possible to get accountID from login without fetching from backend?

Oh that makes total sense, I'll mention that in the offline step as expected behaviour since IMO it is!

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Is it possible to get accountID from login without fetching from backend?

Oh that makes total sense, I'll mention that in the offline step as expected behaviour since IMO it is!

If this is really true, is there any frontend logic to get accountID from login?
I am testing the case when create new group chat with new accounts in offline mode

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

PauloGasparSv commented Jun 12, 2023

I am testing the case when create new group chat with new accounts in offline mode

I don't think there is a way to know that new Account's accountID without connectivity right? So that's why I think we should consider it intended behavior, you can't check someone's profile and info without connection : )

Please LMK if I'm wrong on this!

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

I am testing the case when create new group chat with new accounts in offline mode

I don't think there is a way to know that new Account's accountID without connectivity right? So that's why I think we should consider it intended behavior, you can't check someone's profile and info without connection : )

ok so this feature should not be available in offline mode until get connection and fetch contacts list.

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

PauloGasparSv commented Jun 12, 2023

ok so this feature should not be available in offline mode until get connection and fetch contacts list.

I think so! Updated QA steps for that and added tests for new accounts you didn't have a chat with before.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny can you double confirm?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

So there's no user feedback for now when click display name that doesn't have accountID.
We can polish this later but NAB for this PR.

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thks for the super speedy reviews too!

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv merged commit 15d8c11 into main Jun 12, 2023
@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv deleted the paulogasparsv-fix-group-contact-profile-navigation branch June 12, 2023 19:39
@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor Author

PauloGasparSv commented Jun 12, 2023

Will ask for a CP to staging!
Actually discussing that here : p

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ ⚠️ Heads up! This pull request has the CP Staging label ⚠️ ⚠️
If you applied the CP Staging label before the PR was merged, the PR will be be immediately deployed to staging even if the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist is locked.
However if you applied the CP Staging after the PR was merged it's possible it won't be CP'ed automatically. If you need it to be CP'ed to staging, tag a member of @Expensify/mobile-deployers to CP it manually, otherwise you can wait for it to go out with the next deploy.

OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2023
…act-profile-navigation

Fix the navigation to chat group member profiles

(cherry picked from commit 15d8c11)
OSBotify added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.26-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.26-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.28-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.28-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants