Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate TooltipRenderedOnPageBody and fix tooltip flicker/moving when the content changes #18189

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 8, 2023

Conversation

bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

Details

The main goal of the PR is to fix the flickering of the tooltip when the content changes. To achieve it, we need to use useLayoutEffect which is only available on functional component, thus the migration is also done here.

Fixed Issues

$ #17555
PROPOSAL: #17555 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

Android/iOS/mWeb
No tooltip on these platforms

Web/Desktop

  1. Open any chat
  2. Click on their profile image
  3. Hover over the Copy icon next to the user email/phone number
  4. Verify a tooltip shows with a text "Copy to clipboard"
  5. Click the Copy icon
  6. Verify the tooltip text changes to "Copied"
  7. Wait for a while and verify the text changes back to "Copy to clipboard"
  8. Repeat 5-7
  9. Verify the tooltip does not flicker/moving when the text changes
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-04-29.at.18.19.16.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome

No Tooltip

Mobile Web - Safari

No Tooltip

Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-04-29.at.18.24.10.mov
iOS

No Tooltip

Android

No Tooltip

@bernhardoj bernhardoj requested a review from a team as a code owner April 29, 2023 10:39
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from amyevans and mananjadhav and removed request for a team April 29, 2023 10:39
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@amyevans @mananjadhav One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bernhardoj commented Apr 29, 2023

Turns out there are more changes than expected. Here is the explanation of the changes:

To prevent the tooltip flickering/moving, we use useLayoutEffect and remove onLayout, which means we need to migrate the component to functional.

Besides migrating it, there are also some logic changes to the component, mainly the tooltipContentWidth and the getTooltipStyles.

Before:
tooltipContentWidth is used to calculate the tooltip width. If it's bigger then props.maxWidth, we use props.maxWidth. If the text changes, we set tooltipContentWidth to undefined so the tooltip width will also be undefined which means it will take as wide as it can and then recalculate the position.

Now:
To correctly calculate the tooltip position, all value will be in it's default state.
tooltipWidth, tooltipHeight, left, top -> 0
tooltipContentWidth -> undefined
scale -> 1
maxWidth will always be set to 375

(because we set all value initially to their "default", we don't need this workaround anymore that fixed this issue)
When the useLayoutEffect runs, we get the width and height of the tooltip and it's content, then show the tooltip to the user with the correct style. (actually the same step explained in the doc). Now, the most different thing is when the text changes. Previously, when the text changes, we set tooltipContentWidth back to undefined to calculate the new position. However, this is slow because there are multiple render happens.

text changes -> rerender -> update tooltipContentWidth to undefined -> rerender -> calculate new position -> rerender

In order to solve it, I use key with the key of this.props.text so whenever the text changes TooltipRenderedOnPageBody will completely remount with a fresh state which will prevent the flickering/moving.

Last thing, I just realized that tooltip with custom component content could also changes, for example the reaction tooltip (the only custom tooltip). Here is a recording on main branch showing the reaction tooltip flickers.

Screen.Recording.2023-04-29.at.16.56.41.mov

So, to solve it, I introduce a new props called renderTooltipContentKey to allow the custom tooltip to pass what key that if changes could resize it's content and added it as a key along with this.props.text.

In short, we follow the same step as mentioned in the doc). When the text changes, we remount the component which will repeat the exact steps from the doc

It's quite hard to explain it all with words, so please ask if there is anything confusing 😄.

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is additional video to show the tooltip still works fine on other components:

Screen.Recording.2023-04-29.at.18.20.03.mov

===

Btw, I notice that currently (on prod), the tooltip won't move if the wrapped component width increase/decrease. If we care about that, I think we can create a new issue to investigate it (it's because the wrapped component width is not updated, but I guess it needs quite a lot changes too, so I leave it as it is)

Screen.Recording.2023-04-29.at.19.04.37.mov

mananjadhav
mananjadhav previously approved these changes May 4, 2023
@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@bernhardoj I understood the changes and thanks for updating this, turned out really well. I am just a bit concerned about the type here renderTooltipContentKey: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.any), and I'll leave that for @amyevans to decide.

Testing now.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web-tooltip-func.mov
web-safari-tooltip-func_pz9Vx3zR.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome

-NA-

Mobile Web - Safari

-NA-

Desktop
desktop-tooltip-func.mov
iOS

-NA-

Android

-NA-

----

Thanks for the patience here @bernhardoj. I had to test this on Web Chrome and Safari both and Desktop. @amyevans All yours.

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav thanks for the review.

concerned about the type here renderTooltipContentKey: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.any)

Hmm yeah, maybe we can make it specific to one of string, number, or bool?

renderTooltipContentKey: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.oneOfType([
    PropTypes.number,
    PropTypes.string,
    PropTypes.bool,
])),

From my testing, key won't work if the type is an object.

Copy link
Contributor

@amyevans amyevans left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good!

src/components/Tooltip/TooltipRenderedOnPageBody.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/Tooltip/tooltipPropTypes.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@amyevans
Copy link
Contributor

amyevans commented May 8, 2023

Manan is offline and previously approved, so I'm going to proceed and merge!

@amyevans amyevans merged commit 4ef30e8 into Expensify:main May 8, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/amyevans in version: 1.3.12-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.12-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/amyevans in version: 1.3.12-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅


// We pass a key, so whenever the content changes this component will completely remount with a fresh state.
// This prevents flickering/moving while remaining performant.
key={[this.props.text, ...this.props.renderTooltipContentKey]}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line caused a regression in #19693 , Using a key will trigger the view to re-render when the text changes. However, if the text changes before the animation finishes, it will cancel the animation, and the tooltip will disappear. More context

}, [props.text, props.renderTooltipContent]);

useLayoutEffect(() => {
// Calculate the tooltip width and height before the browser repaints the screen to prevent flicker
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from #48691, we had an issue where the tooltip displays as blank. This happens because the tooltip component gets frozen when navigating several screens away and then back and when this effect is called a second time, the size is calculated as 0 due to the animation effect scale(0). More details here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants