Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disable renaming public rooms if the current user is not an admin or the creator of the linked workspace #15688

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Mar 12, 2023

Conversation

jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg commented Mar 6, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/266085

Tests

(if you're using the web proxy, just follow the QA steps instead)

  1. Create a new workspace and create a new room with public visibility on that workspace (FAB > "New Room"). Save the reportID.
  2. Sign out of the account that created the workspace, and sign into a different account that isn't in the workspace.
  3. Navigate to the report from [1] (i.e. localhost:8080/r/<reportID) > Settings.
  4. Verify that you are unable to update the report name.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Sign in the with following account: bryanna54@cwroutinesp.com (password asdfASDF00)
  2. Navigate to the following report: https://new.expensify.com/r/6794758698552692
  3. Go to the report details. Verify that you are unable to modify the report name.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 10 22 03 AM
Mobile Web - Chrome Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 11 38 44 AM
Mobile Web - Safari Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 11 32 43 AM
Desktop Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 11 25 57 AM
iOS Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 11 37 06 AM
Android Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 11 39 45 AM

@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg self-assigned this Mar 6, 2023
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg changed the title Disable renaming public rooms if the current user is not an admin or the creator of the linked workspace [HOLD App#15392] Disable renaming public rooms if the current user is not an admin or the creator of the linked workspace Mar 6, 2023
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg changed the title [HOLD App#15392] Disable renaming public rooms if the current user is not an admin or the creator of the linked workspace Disable renaming public rooms if the current user is not an admin or the creator of the linked workspace Mar 7, 2023
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg marked this pull request as ready for review March 7, 2023 19:43
@jasperhuangg jasperhuangg requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2023 19:43
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from bondydaa and eVoloshchak and removed request for a team March 7, 2023 19:43
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@eVoloshchak @bondydaa One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

eVoloshchak commented Mar 8, 2023

@jasperhuangg, where can I find ./script/sql.sh file to test this?
Also, when I create a new room, it isn't displayed
Screenshot 2023-03-08 at 18 47 03

Do I need my account to be added to the policy rooms beta on dev for this to work?

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor Author

jasperhuangg commented Mar 8, 2023

@eVoloshchak I've updated the testing steps, you don't need that script anymore.

Do I need my account to be added to the policy rooms beta on dev for this to work?

You can just sign in with the testing account that I've provided in the QA steps, that's already been added to all the necessary betas, and you can just follow the QA steps if you're using WEB_PROXY=true. I've updated the instructions

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Gonna ask for more reviews since we want to get this deployed before Friday

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

eVoloshchak commented Mar 8, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web image
Mobile Web - Chrome

Screenshot_20230309-004437_Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Simulator Screen Shot - iPhone 12 - 2023-03-09 at 00 47 28

Desktop image
iOS

Simulator Screen Shot - iPhone 12 - 2023-03-09 at 00 46 56

Android

Screenshot_20230309-004334_New Expensify

eVoloshchak
eVoloshchak previously approved these changes Mar 8, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@eVoloshchak eVoloshchak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and tests well with the updated instructions, thanks

@MelvinBot
Copy link

🎯 @eVoloshchak, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #15756.

src/pages/ReportSettingsPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/ReportSettingsPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aldo-expensify
Copy link
Contributor

aldo-expensify commented Mar 9, 2023

After you correct the function name here: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/15688/files#r1130755483, I'll approve.

Sorry for the slowness, just got to test it today.

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Added a commit to this while Jasper is OOO, please give this a review (we want this out before ECX)

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Okay tested locally, good to go cc @MonilBhavsar or @aldo-expensify

eVoloshchak
eVoloshchak previously approved these changes Mar 10, 2023
src/pages/ReportSettingsPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/pages/ReportSettingsPage.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bondydaa @aldo-expensify @thienlnam Thank you guys for keeping this moving while I've been out sick. I have literally been in bed all day 😢

fixed the conditions and consolidated the logic as stated in your review comments, good for another look!

Copy link
Contributor

@thienlnam thienlnam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one comment about the naming of the linked workspace (can be addressed in a seperate PR)

Otherwise this looks good
I know this is urgent so going to approve

* @param {Object|null} linkedWorkspace - the workspace the report is on, null if the user isn't a member of the workspace
* @returns {Boolean}
*/
shouldDisableRename(linkedWorkspace) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we just change this to currentWorkspace? I am not sure what linked workspace implies

@thienlnam thienlnam dismissed bondydaa’s stale review March 12, 2023 13:46

Comments addressed

@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit 57a2129 into main Mar 12, 2023
@thienlnam thienlnam deleted the jasper-disableRename branch March 12, 2023 13:48
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.2.83-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.2.83-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.2.83-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants