Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support displaying backend errors in Form #11465

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 21, 2022
Merged

Conversation

youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

@youssef-lr youssef-lr commented Sep 30, 2022

Details

This PR adds support for displaying errorFields coming from the backend. Previously we could only display a backend error in the Onyx key errors above the submit buttons. This will enable us to display backend errors under the relevant inputs.

Fixed Issues

$ #11267

Tests

Regression test: let's test one of the forms that uses Form and make sure everything works properly.

  1. Go to Settings => Payments => Add a debit card.
  2. Test that form error handling works well:
    • Leaving an input empty and focusing somewhere else should show an error.
    • Fill in an input, then clear it, make sure an error is displayed.
    • Clicking on 'fix the errors' button should focus on the first input with an error.
    • Entering valid information clears the error.
    • Submitting the valid form sends a request to the server. (No need to add an actual card, just make sure the request is sent)

Testing error displayed under a field with a backend error (must be tested with https://github.com/Expensify/Web-Expensify/pull/35548)

  1. Edit a Workspace name to <b></b> and click Save.
  2. Make sure the error is shown as in the screenshot below:

Screenshot 2022-11-21 at 19 47 47

3. Clicking on 'fix the errors' should focus on the input of the name of the workspace.

PR Review Checklist

Contributor (PR Author) Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • Any functional components have the displayName property
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The Contributor+ will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • Any functional components have the displayName property
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

QA Steps

  1. Go to Settings => Payments => Add a debit card.
  2. Test that form error handling works well:
    • Leaving an input empty and focusing somewhere else should show an error.
    • Fill in an input, then clear it, make sure an error is displayed.
    • Clicking on 'fix the errors' button should focus on the first input with an error.
    • Entering valid information clears the error.
    • Submitting the valid form sends a request to the server. (No need to add an actual card, just make sure the request is sent)
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Screenshots

Web

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

iOS

Android

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2022

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title Youssef refactor form Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button Sep 30, 2022
@youssef-lr youssef-lr marked this pull request as ready for review September 30, 2022 17:37
@youssef-lr youssef-lr requested a review from a team as a code owner September 30, 2022 17:37
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from deetergp and removed request for a team September 30, 2022 17:38
<FormAlertWithSubmitButton
buttonText={this.props.submitButtonText}
isAlertVisible={_.size(this.state.errors) > 0 || Boolean(this.props.formState.error)}
isLoading={this.props.formState.isLoading}
message={this.props.formState.error}
message={_.isEmpty(this.props.formState.errorFields) ? this.getErrorMessage() : null}
Copy link
Contributor Author

@youssef-lr youssef-lr Sep 30, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I figured I should add this check here to avoid displaying a duplicate message on both the error field above the submit button and below the errored input. Instead, we will display the fixTheErrors message and the field error message below the input.

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

@youssef-lr What are the testing steps? If not having JS Console errors is the only test, this will probably never pass local testing since there is always SOME kind of JS console error going on in local dev 😅

@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button [WIP] Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button Sep 30, 2022
@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey Scott! I just added [WIP] to the title, I'm waiting for feedback on the linked issue before I can finalize this PR and then I'll add tests.

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @youssef-lr, I am going to drop myself from this PR so it isn't beaming its angry red text at me in my K2. Feel free to add me back when it's no longer an WIP and ready for review.

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor Author

No worries @deetergp!

@deetergp deetergp removed their request for review November 10, 2022 18:26
@youssef-lr youssef-lr self-assigned this Nov 11, 2022
@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title [WIP] Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button Nov 14, 2022
@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button [NO QA] Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button Nov 14, 2022
@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title [NO QA] Support recent Onyx error keys in Form, and add option to hide the submit button [NO QA] Support display backend errors in Form Nov 14, 2022
@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title [NO QA] Support display backend errors in Form [NO QA] Support displaying backend errors in Form Nov 14, 2022
@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor Author

youssef-lr commented Nov 16, 2022

hey @ctkochan22 - I hope you don't mind reviewing this and testing it along with your Web-E PR! I didn't know what to put in the test steps as we're not actively using errorFields in forms in the backend yet. (That is forms that are handled by Form.js in App)

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah there doesn't seem to be a way to test for now. We should simply do regression testing.

Can you add regression testing? Like pick a couple forms, and make sure error validations show up normally?

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

We shoudl update the .md like botify mentions

@youssef-lr youssef-lr changed the title [NO QA] Support displaying backend errors in Form Support displaying backend errors in Form Nov 21, 2022
@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

I'll test and merge, but please also move regression testing to QA so they'll have a chance to test it again

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done @ctkochan22.

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

The Contributor+ will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by tagging the marketing team on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • Any functional components have the displayName property
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@ctkochan22 ctkochan22 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add clear QA regression tests as well before this gets deployed please!

@ctkochan22 ctkochan22 merged commit 00d7c61 into main Nov 21, 2022
@ctkochan22 ctkochan22 deleted the youssef_refactor_form branch November 21, 2022 22:12
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Nov 21, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@ctkochan22 looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist filled out

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @ctkochan22 in version: 1.2.30-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @ctkochan22 in version: 1.2.30-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @luacmartins in version: 1.2.30-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@@ -90,6 +93,17 @@ class Form extends React.Component {
return this.props.formState.error || (typeof latestErrorMessage === 'string' ? latestErrorMessage : '');
}

getFirstErroredInput() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just come across this randomly but this is missing a JSDoc and should have an @returns

return;
}

return _.first(_.keys(hasStateErrors ? this.state.erorrs : this.props.formState.errorFields));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this.state.erorrs is a typo ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants