[$500] Chat - Chat is not scrolled to the new message on a newly created WS chat after whisper message

[lanitochka17]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.56-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

1. Create a new workspace as account A and invite account B
2. As account B open the workspace chat of the newly created WS on step 1
3. Note the whisper message and send a message after the whisper message

Expected Result:

The chat should scroll down to the new sent message

Actual Result:

Chat page does not scroll to the bottom to the new message sent after the whisper message

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6423703_1711139703006.Screen_Recording_20240322_232619_Chrome.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0195afebb1a07596ef
• Upwork Job ID: 1772292798302457856
• Last Price Increase: 2024-04-09
• Automatic offers:
• ikevin127 | Contributor | 0

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @robertjchen (Engineering), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

[lanitochka17]

@robertjchen FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors

[gijoe0295]

I think same RCA as #38848.

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0195afebb1a07596ef

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @thesahindia (External)

[robertjchen]

Yep, this can be handled as an External task 👍

[melvin-bot]

Upwork job price has been updated to $250

[melvin-bot]

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

[melvin-bot]

Upwork job price has been updated to $500

[robertjchen]

updated

[robertjchen]

Awaiting proposals

[tsa321]

Proposals

Cross posting my proposal from other issue, I think this issue has same RCA.

[melvin-bot]

@robertjchen, @anmurali Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[robertjchen]

Looks like it may be resolved by #40724 (comment) 👍

[melvin-bot]

@robertjchen, @anmurali Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

[robertjchen]

Pending solution in #40724 (comment)

[mvtglobally]

Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (First week)

[melvin-bot]

This issue has not been updated in over 15 days. @robertjchen, @anmurali eroding to Monthly issue.

P.S. Is everyone reading this sure this is really a near-term priority? Be brave: if you disagree, go ahead and close it out. If someone disagrees, they'll reopen it, and if they don't: one less thing to do!

[robertjchen]

Nice, looks like the change was deployed there. Given that it's unreproducible here, I'll close this out in favor of the one there 👍 #40724 (comment)

[parasharrajat]

I might be eligible for some compensation on this issue.

Reason:

1. I helped review the first PR created for this. Even though it was reverted, I was requested to review it on Slack.

Reviewed PR: #40286

@anmurali @robertjchen

[mallenexpensify]

@luacmartins and @mountiny. @parasharrajat has requested payment of 50% for this issue because they worked on the PR.

@luacmartins luacmartins requested review from parasharrajat

I'm going to pay later this week, assuming neither of you disagree.

[parasharrajat]

Payment requested as per #38855 (comment)

[JmillsExpensify]

$250 approved for @parasharrajat