Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HOLD for payment 2023-05-22] [$1000] Company name is out of screen on Additional information page #18000

Closed
6 tasks
kavimuru opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 26 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Apr 26, 2023

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Go to Settings > Workspaces >Connect bank account
  2. click on connect manually
  3. Enter routing number and account number
  4. click on continue
  5. fill up Company information and add long name as company name(like TestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTestTest)
  6. click on save and continue
  7. fill up Personal information and click on save and continue
  8. add your documents to onfido
  9. check the company name on Additional information screen

Expected Result:

Company names should not be out of screen

Actual Result:

Company name is out of screen

Workaround:

Can the user still use Expensify without this being fixed? Have you informed them of the workaround?

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.5-4
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Screenshot 2023-04-25 at 11 35 48 AM
2

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @gadhiyamanan
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1682405975539849

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01510a094cb737037e
  • Upwork Job ID: 1651437390189281280
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-04-27
@kavimuru kavimuru added Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Apr 26, 2023
@MelvinBot
Copy link

Triggered auto assignment to @kadiealexander (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details.

@MelvinBot
Copy link

MelvinBot commented Apr 26, 2023

Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)

  • This "bug" occurs on a supported platform (ensure Platforms in OP are ✅)
  • This bug is not a duplicate report (check E/App issues and #expensify-bugs)
    • If it is, comment with a link to the original report, close the issue and add any novel details to the original issue instead
  • This bug is reproducible using the reproduction steps in the OP. S/O
    • If the reproduction steps are clear and you're unable to reproduce the bug, check with the reporter and QA first, then close the issue.
    • If the reproduction steps aren't clear and you determine the correct steps, please update the OP.
  • This issue is filled out as thoroughly and clearly as possible
    • Pay special attention to the title, results, platforms where the bug occurs, and if the bug happens on staging/production.
  • I have reviewed and subscribed to the linked Slack conversation to ensure Slack/Github stay in sync

@gadhiyamanan
Copy link
Contributor

gadhiyamanan commented Apr 26, 2023

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Company name is out of screen on Additional information page

What is the root cause of that problem?

width is missing for below Text component

<Text>
{this.props.translate('beneficialOwnersStep.iOwnMoreThan25Percent')}
<Text style={[styles.textStrong]}>{this.props.companyName}</Text>
</Text>

<Text>
{this.props.translate('beneficialOwnersStep.someoneOwnsMoreThan25Percent')}
<Text style={[styles.textStrong]}>{this.props.companyName}</Text>
</Text>

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

add style={[styles.w100]} to below Text component


Result

image

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor

dhairyasenjaliya commented Apr 26, 2023

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

  • Company name is out of screen on Additional information page 

What is the root cause of that problem?

  • The reason is we are using <CheckboxWithLabel> with LabelComponent which doest have any flex property so for that reason text is over flown in screen without adapting the width of the parent component

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

  • We just need to wrap both nested <Text> component into <View> and add flex1 as style
  • Further for better code visibility we can improve by removing nested text and place as separate <Text> as nested is really not required here
  • Optionally we can also set number of line for company name limit
  • Also we are using same approach in RequestorStep.js as well make sense to add flex1 rather then fixed width
  • Optionally to match with CheckboxWithLabel -> label component we can additionally add styles.ml1 since that component has
  • Changes in page https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/3bc9d8b5acb608a66bc4ec62b5750628fa3aafc4/src/pages/ReimbursementAccount/ACHContractStep.js
                            <CheckboxWithLabel
                                inputID="ownsMoreThan25Percent"
                                style={[styles.mb2]}
                                LabelComponent={() => (
+                                    <View style={[styles.flex1]}>
                                        <Text>
                                            {this.props.translate('beneficialOwnersStep.iOwnMoreThan25Percent')}
                                        </Text>
                                        <Text style={[styles.textStrong]}>{this.props.companyName}</Text>
+                                    </View>
                                )} 
                            />


                            <CheckboxWithLabel
                                inputID="hasOtherBeneficialOwners"
                                style={[styles.mb2]}
                                LabelComponent={() => (
+                                    <View style={[styles.flex1]}>
                                        <Text>
                                            {this.props.translate('beneficialOwnersStep.someoneOwnsMoreThan25Percent')}
                                        </Text>
                                        <Text style={[styles.textStrong]}>{this.props.companyName}</Text>
+                                    </View>
                                )} 
                            />
  • Optional changes inside <CheckboxWithLabel> we have predefined label component which doesn’t have the flex1 property which has also issue when we have we can add there as well

@kadiealexander
Copy link
Contributor

Repro'd on version 1.3.6-0.

image

@kadiealexander kadiealexander added the External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor label Apr 27, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Company name is out of screen on Additional information page [$1000] Company name is out of screen on Additional information page Apr 27, 2023
@MelvinBot
Copy link

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01510a094cb737037e

@MelvinBot
Copy link

Current assignee @kadiealexander is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

@MelvinBot
Copy link

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @eVoloshchak (External)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Apr 27, 2023
@MelvinBot
Copy link

Triggered auto assignment to @roryabraham (External), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor

Proposal - 2

What is the root cause of that problem?

  • The reason is we are using with LabelComponent which doest have any flex property so for that reason text is overflown in the screen without adapting the width of the parent component

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

  • To apply the fix at the global component we could wrap this.LabelComponent inside an <View> with flex1 style it will apply to all LabelComponent changes needed at CheckboxWithLabel.js
                        {this.LabelComponent && (
  +                      <View style={styles.flex1}>
                            <this.LabelComponent />
  +                     </View>
                        )}

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Apr 27, 2023

Proposal

Please re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.

Company name or any long text within CheckboxWithLabel labelcontent overflow from its parent width.

What is the root cause of that problem?

Default word-break for the text is normal and we are not providing any word-break strategy for it.

What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?

Add styles.breakWord here which will break the long word if it requires and won't allow overflow.

styles.noSelect,

Result Screenshot 2023-04-27 at 10 55 31 AM

@huzaifa-99

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Accepting @dhairyasenjaliya's proposal 2

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Apr 27, 2023
@MelvinBot
Copy link

📣 @dhairyasenjaliya You have been assigned to this job by @roryabraham!
Please apply to this job in Upwork and leave a comment on the Github issue letting us know when we can expect a PR to be ready for review 🧑‍💻
Keep in mind: Code of Conduct | Contributing 📖

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Apr 28, 2023
@dhairyasenjaliya
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham @eVoloshchak PR ready for review

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 5, 2023

@eVoloshchak, @roryabraham, @dhairyasenjaliya, @kadiealexander Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 9, 2023

@eVoloshchak, @roryabraham, @dhairyasenjaliya, @kadiealexander Still overdue 6 days?! Let's take care of this!

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

Not overdue, PR is in review

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Daily KSv2 labels May 15, 2023
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [$1000] Company name is out of screen on Additional information page [HOLD for payment 2023-05-22] [$1000] Company name is out of screen on Additional information page May 15, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 15, 2023

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label May 15, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 15, 2023

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.13-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-05-22. 🎊

After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.

  • External issue reporter
  • Contributor that fixed the issue
  • Contributor+ that helped on the issue and/or PR

As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:

  • Merged PR within 3 business days of assignment - 50% bonus
  • Merged PR more than 9 business days after assignment - 50% penalty

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 15, 2023

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Daily KSv2 and removed Weekly KSv2 labels May 21, 2023
@kadiealexander
Copy link
Contributor

Sent contracts to everyone! No speed bonus based on:

Assigned: April 28 10:31pm (GMT+12)
Merged: May 10th 8:35am (GMT+12)

@eVoloshchak any thoughts on the checklist above?

@gadhiyamanan
Copy link
Contributor

@kadiealexander accepted, thanks!

@kadiealexander
Copy link
Contributor

Everyone has been paid except for @eVoloshchak, this payment is on hold until this list is completed. Thank you!

@eVoloshchak
Copy link
Contributor

  • The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: Not applicable, this was missed during the initial implementation in Add VBA flow Part 1 #3459 a long time ago

  • The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A

  • A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: This is purely a visual bug, we already have the necessary items in the checklist, I don't think additional discussion is required

  • Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
    Is it easy to test for this bug? No (it's time consuming, requires you to enter a lot of information)
    Is the bug related to an important user flow? Yes
    Is it an impactful bug? No

    This bug has a very low impact and can be reproduced only if you enter a really long company name, I'd say the regression tests isn't necessary here

@kadiealexander
Copy link
Contributor

kadiealexander commented May 24, 2023

Thanks @eVoloshchak! Everyone is paid, appreciate your work on this one, everyone!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants