-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-04-20] Push notification background updates don't seem to be working #17240
Comments
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~017276e0552aa2476d |
Triggered auto assignment to @dylanexpensify ( |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor Plus for review of internal employee PR - @s77rt ( |
Internal access only for logs so removing C+ |
Okay this was caused by the Airship 15 migration. I missed migrating the event listener callbacks. Specifically, they changed the shape of the notification object we receive. So we weren't getting the payload properly resulting in this error:
|
@arosiclair anything needed here on my end? From the looks of it I don't think so, but wanna make sure I'm not missing anything :) |
Nope you should be good! Fixes for this'll hit prod very soon |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.2.99-6 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-04-20. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
As a reminder, here are the bonuses/penalties that should be applied for any External issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Let's see where the discussion goes before proposing regression test steps |
@arosiclair any updates on where we're at with Regression test? |
I think we're not gonna add any new regression steps for this. If we do, it would be for this related bug on notification click through instead. However, it looks like we already have regression test steps for that here. Continuing discussion here |
Cool cool, no payments here are due, right? |
Yup no payment. Everything was internal |
Not overdue, any updates @arosiclair? |
Yeah we do have existing regression steps for notification click through here so no need to add more. Looks like this bug made it into production because we already had an open bug for it. So next time we just have to be more diligent about labeling it as a deploy blocker when it hits staging. With that said, I think this is all set! |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
We should have at least a few results for some of these messages
Actual Result:
We have no logs for Airship messages since 4/2 at least (my logs)
Workaround:
No workaround necessary, but this being broken is a subpar UX.
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: v1.2.97-2
Reproducible in staging?: Yes
Reproducible in production?: Not sure
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @quinthar
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C04E99DVBTP/p1681152024687099?thread_ts=1680980284.168379&cid=C04E99DVBTP
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: