Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix the closing minimum fee. #6547

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 12, 2023

Conversation

rustyrussell
Copy link
Contributor

Triggered by taproot, our mutual closing tx is slightly larger than our final commitment tx. This could happen in theory before (if both specified P2WSH outputs) but nobody ever did that.

We capped the fee at the final commitment_tx fee, for compatibility reasons which have now passed (the spec was changed to remove this 2 years ago by @t-bast, and we removed our enforcement of it in 0.10.2). Removing that simply fixes this problem: that if fees were really low (such as #6545 shows on regtest) we could create a mutual close which didn't even relay!

@rustyrussell rustyrussell added the protocol These issues are protocol level issues that should be discussed on the protocol spec repo label Aug 11, 2023
@rustyrussell rustyrussell added this to the v23.08 milestone Aug 11, 2023
@rustyrussell rustyrussell requested a review from cdecker as a code owner August 11, 2023 05:21
vincenzopalazzo

This comment was marked as outdated.

```
$ l1-cli close 445x1x1 
# Sending closing fee offer 183sat, with range 0sat-183sat
# Received closing fee offer 183sat, with range 0sat-1000000sat
{
   "tx": "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",
   "txid": "216ed9adf8df623770e219f52b31350de60cd1b236d6f043664d9eb5bc462ad4",
   "type": "mutual"
}
rusty@rusty-Framework:~/devel/cvs/lightning (master)$ bt-cli getrawmempool
[
]
```

Logs show:

```
2023-08-11T02:20:13.947Z DEBUG   plugin-bcli: sendrawtx exit 26 (bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/home/rusty/.bitcoin sendrawtransaction 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) error code: -26\nerror message:\nmin relay fee not met, 183 < 192

Indeed, tx weight is 192!
```

Reported-by: @ShahanaFarooqui
Presumably we still want to insist that this have *some* chance to propagate.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
…l close.

In spec commit 498f104fd399488c77f449d05cb21c0b604636a2 (August 2021),
Bastien Teinturier removed the requirement that the mutual close fee be
less than or equal the final commitment tx.

We adopted that change in v0.10.2, but we made sure to never offer a fee
under the final commitment tx's fee, so we didn't break older nodes.

However, the closing tx can actually be larger than the final commitment tx!
The final commit tx has a 22-byte P2WKH output and a 34-byte P2WSH output;
the closing can have two 34-byte outputs, making it 4*8 = 32 Sipa heavier.
Previously this would only happen if both sides asked for P2WSH outputs,
but now it happens with P2TR, which we now do.

The result is that we create a tx which is below the finally commitment
tx fee, and may be below minrelayfee (as it was in regtest).

So it's time to remove that backwards-compatibility hack.

Changelog-Fixed: Protocol: We may propose mutual close transaction which has a slightly higher fee than the final commitment tx (depending on the outputs, e.g. two taproot outputs).
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fixes: ElementsProject#6545
@rustyrussell rustyrussell merged commit 6a16a6f into ElementsProject:master Aug 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
protocol These issues are protocol level issues that should be discussed on the protocol spec repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants