Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lightningd: fix crash when we try to send fail_htlc msg to onchaind. #4122

Merged

Conversation

rustyrussell
Copy link
Contributor

Great report from whitslack on this crash at startup:

2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: FATAL SIGNAL 6 (version 0.9.1)
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: common/daemon.c:51 (crashdump) 0x559fb67bcc76
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sigaction.c:0 ((null)) 0x7f61cdca8baf
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 (__GI_raise) 0x7f61cdca8b31
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/stdlib/abort.c:79 (__GI_abort) 0x7f61cdc92535
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/assert/assert.c:92 (__assert_fail_base) 0x7f61cdc9241e
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/assert/assert.c:101 (__GI___assert_fail) 0x7f61cdca1241
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/subd.c:750 (subd_send_msg) 0x559fb67a1c31
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/subd.c:745 (subd_send_msg) 0x559fb67a1c31
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:252 (local_fail_in_htlc) 0x559fb6798f77
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:1441 (onchain_failed_our_htlc) 0x559fb6798f77
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/onchain_control.c:339 (handle_missing_htlc_output) 0x559fb6786b9d
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/onchain_control.c:455 (onchain_msg) 0x559fb6786b9d

The problem is a channel with an onchaind can be in state FUNDING_STATE_SEEN,
because onchaind has started but not responded to init yet (which it does once it
has analyzed the commitment tx).

Channel B is onchain, and its onchaind fails the HTLC, and we try to send a msg
to channel A's onchaind as if it were channeld.

Explicitly check if it's channeld, rather than trying to see if it's onchaind.

Fixes: #4114
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell rusty@rustcorp.com.au

@cdecker
Copy link
Member

cdecker commented Oct 13, 2020

ACK 8ff161b

Great report from whitslack on this crash at startup:

```
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: FATAL SIGNAL 6 (version 0.9.1)
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: common/daemon.c:51 (crashdump) 0x559fb67bcc76
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sigaction.c:0 ((null)) 0x7f61cdca8baf
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 (__GI_raise) 0x7f61cdca8b31
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/stdlib/abort.c:79 (__GI_abort) 0x7f61cdc92535
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/assert/assert.c:92 (__assert_fail_base) 0x7f61cdc9241e
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: /var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r2/work/glibc-2.32/assert/assert.c:101 (__GI___assert_fail) 0x7f61cdca1241
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/subd.c:750 (subd_send_msg) 0x559fb67a1c31
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/subd.c:745 (subd_send_msg) 0x559fb67a1c31
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:252 (local_fail_in_htlc) 0x559fb6798f77
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/peer_htlcs.c:1441 (onchain_failed_our_htlc) 0x559fb6798f77
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/onchain_control.c:339 (handle_missing_htlc_output) 0x559fb6786b9d
2020-10-07T13:03:21.419Z **BROKEN** lightningd: backtrace: lightningd/onchain_control.c:455 (onchain_msg) 0x559fb6786b9d
```

The problem is a channel with an onchaind can be in state FUNDING_STATE_SEEN,
because onchaind has started but not responded to init yet (which it does once it
has analyzed the commitment tx).

Channel B is onchain, and its onchaind fails the HTLC, and we try to send a msg
to channel A's onchaind as if it were channeld.

Explicitly check if it's channeld, rather than trying to see if it's onchaind.

Fixes: ElementsProject#4114
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Changelog-Fixed: crash: assertion fail at restart when source and destination channels of an HTLC are both onchain.
@rustyrussell rustyrussell merged commit ec868d4 into ElementsProject:master Oct 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Assertion failed (FATAL SIGNAL 6) in subd_send_msg
2 participants