-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 912
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Start an FAQ #3551
doc: Start an FAQ #3551
Conversation
|
||
In order to receive payments you need some incoming liquidity, which you can gain by paying | ||
through the channels you opened or by having other peers to open some channels to you. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For example, you can use a service that exchanges Lightning Bitcoins for onchain Bitcoins (so that you do not lose your Bitcoins, or be forced to exchange it for other assets) in order to get incoming liquidity. There also exist services that will, for a fee or for free, create channels to you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep i know about them but i was not sure about promoting them in our faq
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need to name names (specific ones may not be around forever anyway, so ---), at least it gives a hint to the user to search for such services by themselves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, you are right.
42ad158
to
346751f
Compare
Added @ZmnSCPxj suggestion |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there are definitely better ways to submit copy suggestions than 61 in-line comments, but in my defense i did not set out to make 61 in-line comments when reviewing this, just a few grammatical corrections.
😆
Thank you very much for this thorough review @niftynei ! Didn't see it before.. |
Corrected and answered in-line |
|
||
[Spark-wallet](https://github.com/shesek/spark-wallet/) is the most used remote control, | ||
and care is taken to avoid breaking it too often. | ||
**Use it [behind tor](https://github.com/shesek/spark-wallet/blob/master/doc/onion.md)**. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I forget not everyone proxies their node through a decoy :P
imo this rationale for "why tor" is worth adding to the FAQ.
block [598000](https://blockstream.info/block/0000000000000000000dd93b8fb5c622b9c903bf6f921ef48e266f0ead7faedb) | ||
(short channel id starting with > 598000) have a high chance of supporting `option_static_remotekey`. | ||
|
||
You can verify it using the `features` field from the [`listpeers` command](https://lightning.readthedocs.io/lightning-listpeers.7.html)'s result. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think copy/pasting the Python one-liner is the most benefit. It gives readers a quick way to check + it 'educates' the curious as to how feature bits work.
ACK b081c7d |
This regroups questions (frequently) seen in Github issues, on IRC, and also some I've been asked in face to face. Changelog-Added: doc: An FAQ was added, accessible at https://lightning.readthedocs.io/FAQ.html Christian wrote the block chain rescaning paragraph. Lisa corrected my poor english grammar. Co-Authored-by: Christian Decker <decker.christian@gmail.com> Co-Authored-by: Lisa Neigut <niftynei@gmail.com>
Tim Ho asked about annouced IP addresses on IRC, and this was not covered in the FAQ.
Corrected as per the latest review |
ACK 6480996 |
Travis shows the integration tests as passing, but it's not showing up on the approval checklist. |
This adds an FAQ, I mainly used the issues (thanks for the
question
label !) but also IRC and face-to-face questions.Do you have an idea of another topic that could/should be covered here ?
closes #3382