Initial draft for RFC004 Individual Wallet Unit Attestation

[ntsbs]

This is the initial draft for RFC004 Individual Wallet Instance Attestations

[andreasabr]

First review done.

[georgepadayatti]

First review is done.

[andreasabr]

@lalc @georgepadayatti @ntsbs One question arose yesterday: Why are we referring now to wallet unit attestation instead of wallet instance attestation? Are these two different things, or are we changing the naming? Actually, the ARF does not mention wallet unit attestation but wallet instance attestation. Shouldn't our vocabulary be aligned?

[lalc]

@lalc @georgepadayatti @ntsbs One question arose yesterday: Why are we referring now to wallet unit attestation instead of wallet instance attestation? Are these two different things, or are we changing the naming? Actually, the ARF does not mention wallet unit attestation but wallet instance attestation. Shouldn't our vocabulary be aligned?

In my opinion, we should align to IA even if it's in draft.

[georgepadayatti]

2nd review done. LGTM💯+ but with some questions.

[lalc]

@georgepadayatti Please raise the issues discussion as well as add two sections as discussed.

1. Wallet Lifecycle
2. Validation Section and add a note that it will be fixed in next iteration
3. Status Management

[lalc]

@lalc @georgepadayatti @ntsbs One question arose yesterday: Why are we referring now to wallet unit attestation instead of wallet instance attestation? Are these two different things, or are we changing the naming? Actually, the ARF does not mention wallet unit attestation but wallet instance attestation. Shouldn't our vocabulary be aligned?

I guess we discussed this and i can close this comment.

[georgepadayatti]

@lalc @ntsbs I have now moved all the outstanding comments to the below issue, so we can resolve them in the next iteration of RFC 004:

#101

[lalc]

I will merge it to main, with outstanding issues to be resolved by #101

@georgepadayatti promised to ensure it's fixed.