Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development ocean scalar fields #1331

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ledm
Copy link
Contributor

@ledm ledm commented Sep 23, 2019

Added some additional features into the time series plots, notably the ability to calculate an anomaly, and to specify plot titles and axes labels in the recipe.

Also, I've added several new data fields into the recipe_ocean_scalar_fields.yml recipe. Several of these figures are being submitted in part 2 of the paper, so I hope that we can get this PR accepted before that paper gets too far along the way,

This is linked with issue #1166.

Copy link
Contributor

@tomaslovato tomaslovato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are still some minor issues signaled by codacy report that could be improved.
Beside that it works for me.

As a general comment, there has been a proliferation of ocean recipes and scripts (that I also contributed) and it will likely be necessary to do some rationalization after the finalization of this PR.
What do you think?

@@ -47,7 +48,299 @@ diagnostics:
variables:
mfo: # sea_water_transport_across_line
mip: Omon
preprocessor: prep_timeseries_drake
additional_datasets:
- {dataset: ACCESS1-0, project: CMIP5, exp: historical, ensemble: r1i1p1, start_year: 1900, end_year: 2004}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might want to consider adding the dataset keys that are the same for all datasets (it looks like that is everything but the dataset name?) as keys under the variable, that would really increase readability.

@mattiarighi mattiarighi changed the base branch from version2_development to master January 3, 2020 17:58
@bouweandela
Copy link
Member

@ledm Any news on this? Is this related to/overlapping with #1621?

@hb326
Copy link
Contributor

hb326 commented Nov 25, 2020

@ledm, is this something we should/could address during the November Workshop?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants