Build and publish the esmvalcore package to conda via Github Actions workflow #825
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Added check for units at the end of derivation function * Fixed tests for variable derivation interface * Adapted several derivation scripts * Adapted sm derivation script for CMIP6 * Fixed derivation of vegfrac and ohc * Fixed CMOR checker when coordinate standard_name is empty
bouweandela
reviewed
Oct 12, 2020
Co-authored-by: Bouwe Andela <b.andela@esciencecenter.nl>
…conda forge channel
|
we have liftoff of the Conda Package space shuttle 🚀 ie all works fine in test mode see GA tests |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This builds and publishes the esmvalcore package to conda - currently untested; the conda build alone step is done via PR #818 so should work OK but the publishing is brand new territory for me. @bouweandela and @fdiblen could you guys have a look please. @fdiblen cheers for the pointer to the test GA workflow you have, I used that one! 🍺 BTW the base branch is
release_2.1so we can easily merge this in the release branch if you guys think it's okay 👍