Updated dependencies

[schlunma]

See discussion here conda-forge/esmvalcore-feedstock#33.

---

Checklist

It is the responsibility of the author to make sure the pull request is ready to review. The icons indicate whether the item will be subject to the 🛠 Technical or 🧪 Scientific review.

• 🧪 The new functionality is relevant and scientifically sound
• 🛠 This pull request has a descriptive title and labels
• 🛠 Code is written according to the code quality guidelines
• 🧪 and 🛠 Documentation is available
• 🛠 Unit tests have been added
• 🛠 Changes are backward compatible
• 🛠 Any changed dependencies have been added or removed correctly
• 🛠 The list of authors is up to date
• 🛠 All checks below this pull request were successful

---

To help with the number pull requests:

• 🙏 We kindly ask you to review two other open pull requests in this repository

[schlunma]

I noticed that the recipe from the feedstock repository deviates quite a lot from package/meta.yml. Would it make sense to unify those?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1521 (131a0da) into main (5babb91) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1521   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.75%   90.75%           
=======================================
  Files         197      197           
  Lines       10552    10552           
=======================================
  Hits         9576     9576           
  Misses        976      976           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5babb91...131a0da. Read the comment docs.

[zklaus]

I think we decided to just get rid of package/meta.yml, but I am not sure if this is already documented somewhere.

[valeriupredoi]

probably just in the minutes of the last TechLead call - I reckon we shouldn't bother with this file n more 👍

[valeriupredoi]

cheers, Manu 🍺

[schlunma]

I think we decided to just get rid of package/meta.yml, but I am not sure if this is already documented somewhere.

Yes, I also think we did that. How about we target that for v2.6? I will open an issue about that.