-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Complete CCPPIzation of Hack shallow convection; dycore tests change to ne3pg3; FCAM4 test #362
Complete CCPPIzation of Hack shallow convection; dycore tests change to ne3pg3; FCAM4 test #362
Conversation
Holding as draft until I finish testing and documenting that the CAM4 tests will likely not run because all the snapshot variables are missing and model would crash (#359) |
45b4c49
to
dd09b41
Compare
Needs #365 to be merged in first |
Updated to |
Hmmm... Maybe you need to rerun git-fleximod? Or get a clean checkout? Peeking at your tests, it looks like they match the old (pre-externals-update) baselines. Let me know if it still isn't working though. Could be a me issue for sure! |
Thanks @peverwhee! Strange, I had made a clean checkout. The baseline changes are related to CAM4/CAM7 suite updates and are expected, so that's all good. I'm not sure if the NLCOMP changes are expected - they appear to be related to externals, maybe? (false alarm!) |
@jimmielin bummer. Yeah, the namelist differences are what concern me. For some reason, my baselines had different namelists... Sounds like a me issue! |
@jimmielin oh. Looking at the git log of your local clone on derecho, your branch isn't at the head of CAM-SIMA development. Once you merge up, those NLCOMP failures should go away. Apologies if you already knew all of this and I'm just catching up. |
Ohhh my bad @peverwhee! False alarm I guess - sorry for the trouble. I will rerun the SIMA tests to be sure but I think this will fix it! |
@peverwhee just confirmed that there are no NLCOMP issues after merging to head of CAM-SIMA. Sorry for the false alarm! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @jimmielin! I just have one small request (but I don't think it needs a re-review).
src/data/registry.xml
Outdated
<variable local_name="delt" | ||
standard_name="half_timestep_for_physics" | ||
units="s" type="real" kind="kind_phys"> | ||
</variable> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this needed? I don't think ZM actually uses a half-physics timestep.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, removed!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @jimmielin I have a couple of questions in the registry, but nothing that prevents my approval!
SIMA regression tests:
|
Tag name (required for release branches): sima0_04_000
Originator(s): jimmielin
Description (include the issue title, and the keyword ['closes', 'fixes', 'resolves'] followed by the issue number):
Describe any changes made to build system: N/A
Describe any changes made to the namelist: N/A
List any changes to the defaults for the input datasets (e.g. boundary datasets): N/A
List all files eliminated and why: N/A
List all files added and what they do: N/A
List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the changes:
(Helpful git command:
git diff --name-status development...<your_branch_name>
)If there are new failures (compared to the
test/existing-test-failures.txt
file),have them OK'd by the gatekeeper, note them here, and add them to the file.
If there are baseline differences, include the test and the reason for the
diff. What is the nature of the change? Roundoff?
SIMA regression tests:
If this changes climate describe any run(s) done to evaluate the new
climate in enough detail that it(they) could be reproduced:
CAM-SIMA date used for the baseline comparison tests if different than latest: