Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pivotal ID # 188114384: Scheduler SLURM Migration #866

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

jhoanmanuelms
Copy link
Contributor

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/188114384

  • Create common Cluster config class
  • Add option to execute scheduler jobs in SLURM
  • Remove unused code

- Create common Cluster config class
- Add option to execute scheduler jobs in SLURM
- Remove unused code
@jhoanmanuelms jhoanmanuelms self-assigned this Aug 14, 2024
@jhoanmanuelms jhoanmanuelms requested a review from Juan-EBI August 14, 2024 15:56
Copy link
Contributor

@Juan-EBI Juan-EBI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ class LsfClusterClient(
companion object {
const val DONE_STATUS = "DONE"
const val EXIT_STATUS = "EXIT"
const val PEND_STATUS = "PEND"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why we have remove this one? (I remember seeing as a valid state)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was never used. Maybe we need to do something with it

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes is not used in a particular test but it is used when obtained job status using API

@jhoanmanuelms jhoanmanuelms merged commit f498d50 into master Aug 27, 2024
1 check passed
@jhoanmanuelms jhoanmanuelms deleted the chore/pivotal-#188114384-slurm-scheduler branch August 27, 2024 11:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants