Ruff: Add FIX001 and FIX003

[manuel-sommer]

Ruff: Add FIX001 and FIX003

[dryrunsecurity]

Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.

DryRun Security	Status	Findings
Configured Codepaths Analyzer	✅	0 findings
Sensitive Files Analyzer	✅	0 findings
AppSec Analyzer	✅	0 findings
Authn/Authz Analyzer	✅	0 findings
Secrets Analyzer	✅	0 findings

Note

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

Change Summary (click to expand)

The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective.

Summary:

As an application security engineer, I have reviewed the changes made in this pull request, which involve updating the SHA-256 checksum file for the dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py file. While the change in the checksum file itself does not directly indicate a security issue, it is important to review the actual code changes in the dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py file to ensure that no security vulnerabilities have been introduced.

Some key aspects to consider are ensuring that any sensitive configuration settings, such as database credentials, API keys, or other secrets, are properly secured and not exposed in the modified file. Additionally, it is crucial to check for any changes that might affect the application's security, such as modifications to authentication, authorization, or input validation mechanisms, and to verify that the changes do not introduce any vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), or other common web application security issues.

Files Changed:

• dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py.sha256sum: This file is a checksum file that contains the SHA-256 hash value for the dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py file. The change in this file indicates that the corresponding dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py file has been modified. It is recommended to review the actual code changes in the dojo/settings/.settings.dist.py file to ensure that no security vulnerabilities have been introduced.

Powered by DryRun Security

[kiblik]

Looks like #10212 was merged in parallel with other PRs that edited settings.dist.py but haven't adopted the checker yet.
Thank you for this.

[kiblik]

Looks like #10212 was merged in parallel with other PRs that edited settings.dist.py but haven't adopted the checker yet. Thank you for this.

😆 it was my other PR: #8824

[kiblik]

Thank you for this PR. I would prefer to go with #10241 because it fixes as well one other issue.

[dryrunsecurity]

DryRun Security Summary

The pull request updates the Ruff configuration file, adding new security-related rules while ignoring certain rules and allowing autofix for all enabled rules, which should be reviewed carefully to ensure that the changes do not introduce any security vulnerabilities or other issues.

Expand for full summary

Summary:

The code changes in this pull request appear to be an update to the Ruff configuration file, which is a tool for linting and formatting Python code. The changes are primarily focused on adding new rule selections and ignoring certain rules. From an application security perspective, the changes suggest that the developers are proactively addressing potential security issues in the codebase by including security-related rules, such as FIX001 and FIX003. However, it's important to review the exceptions and exclusions to ensure that they do not introduce any security vulnerabilities or other issues. Additionally, the allowance of autofix for all enabled rules should be reviewed carefully to ensure that the automatically applied fixes do not have any unintended consequences.

Files Changed:

• ruff.toml: This file is the Ruff configuration file, which is used to configure the linting and formatting rules for the Python codebase. The changes include:
  • Adding new rule selections, such as FIX001 and FIX003, which are likely related to security fixes or improvements.
  • Ignoring certain rules, such as E501 (line too long) and E722 (no exception type(s) specified), which should be reviewed to ensure that the exceptions do not introduce security vulnerabilities or other issues.
  • Allowing autofix for all enabled rules, which can be a useful feature but should be reviewed carefully to ensure that the automatically applied fixes do not have any unintended consequences.
  • Excluding the "dojo/db_migrations" directory from the Ruff linting rules, which suggests that the code in this directory may not be subject to the same level of security review and testing as the rest of the codebase.

Code Analysis

We ran 9 analyzers against 1 file and 0 analyzers had findings. 9 analyzers had no findings.

Riskiness

🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded.

View PR in the DryRun Dashboard.

[mtesauro]

Approved