-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SSI requirements.json file #2813
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2813 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 80.91% 80.90% -0.02%
Complexity 2526 2526
============================================
Files 146 146
Lines 14706 14706
============================================
- Hits 11900 11898 -2
- Misses 2806 2808 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
a677360
to
eed0bed
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice 💪
6b04bd9
to
12736c1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good :-)
50f10f7
to
4eb8229
Compare
Description
Draft, as the RFC might still change.Implementation of the RFC
Tested manually onallow_tests.json
/block_tests.json
using the validator introduced in this PR.This PR does not add a CI job to check the file as one will be added to the shared-pipelineReviewer checklist