Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

appsec: Attacker Fingerprinting #2899

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

eliottness
Copy link
Contributor

@eliottness eliottness commented Sep 30, 2024

What does this PR do?

This PR finishing to setup Attacker fingerprinting:

  • Support for server.business_logic.users.login.success address
  • Support for server.business_logic.users.login.failure address
  • Support for usr.session_id address
  • Add all missing capabilities from the remoteconfig client
  • Register fingerprinting capabilities at appsec start
  • Upgrade the default ruleset to include fingerprinting preprocessors

System-tests job: https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-go/actions/runs/11127586022

Motivation

Implementation of the Attacker Fingerprinting RFC

Reviewer's Checklist

  • Changed code has unit tests for its functionality at or near 100% coverage.
  • System-Tests covering this feature have been added and enabled with the va.b.c-dev version tag.
  • There is a benchmark for any new code, or changes to existing code.
  • If this interacts with the agent in a new way, a system test has been added.
  • Add an appropriate team label so this PR gets put in the right place for the release notes.
  • Non-trivial go.mod changes, e.g. adding new modules, are reviewed by @DataDog/dd-trace-go-guild.

Unsure? Have a question? Request a review!

@eliottness eliottness changed the title appsec: setup login success and failure address to attacker fingerprinting appsec: Attacker Fingerprinting Sep 30, 2024
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-10-01 15:18:36

Comparing candidate commit 332a14d in PR branch eliott.bouhana/APPSEC-54278 with baseline commit daa6823 in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 58 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

scenario:BenchmarkSampleWAFContext-24

  • 🟥 execution_time [+4.399µs; +5.726µs] or [+2.425%; +3.157%]

…nting

Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
…at would not have been sent if empty to always sent

Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
@eliottness eliottness marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 14:34
@eliottness eliottness requested review from a team as code owners October 1, 2024 14:34
@eliottness eliottness merged commit e5a17f2 into main Oct 1, 2024
166 checks passed
@eliottness eliottness deleted the eliott.bouhana/APPSEC-54278 branch October 1, 2024 15:29
MNThomson pushed a commit to agilebits/dd-trace-go that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
Signed-off-by: Eliott Bouhana <eliott.bouhana@datadoghq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants